The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Wiko T40 and Samsung Galaxy A05s both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The Wiko T40 leans on a Mediatek Helio G85 for processing power, while the Samsung Galaxy A05s opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 680. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A05s is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a smoother overall experience and potentially better long-term performance. The A05s also boasts a brighter display and faster 25W charging, making it a more well-rounded package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023, September 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025 | Available. Released 2023, October 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 168 x 77.8 x 8.8 mm (6.61 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB, 256GB | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sunrise Violet, Champagne Gold, Sky Mirror, Dark Blue | Black, Silver, Light Green, Violet |
| Models | - | SM-A057F, SM-A057F/DS, SM-A057M, SM-A057M/DS, SM-A057G/DSN, SM-A057G |
| Price | - | $ 134.00 / C$ 146.99 / £ 83.94 / € 100.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 1.31 W/kg (body) |
Wiko T40
- Reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups
- Potentially lower price point
- Helio G85 offers decent performance for basic tasks
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Slower charging speeds
Samsung Galaxy A05s
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 (6nm)
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Faster 25W charging
- Lacks reverse wired charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Basic camera system
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A05s clearly wins in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 468 nits significantly surpasses what we’d expect from the Wiko T40, making it far more usable outdoors. The 1418:1 contrast ratio on the A05s also contributes to a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. While the Wiko T40’s display specs are unavailable, Samsung’s investment in display technology typically translates to superior color accuracy and viewing angles in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature basic camera setups, and detailed information is limited. The Samsung Galaxy A05s likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which generally delivers better noise reduction and dynamic range. Without specific sensor size details for either device, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally more refined, potentially leading to more pleasing photos in various lighting conditions. We can assume both phones will struggle in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A05s’ Snapdragon 680 (6nm) is architecturally superior to the Wiko T40’s Helio G85 (12nm). The 6nm process allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, meaning the Snapdragon 680 will likely run cooler and sustain performance for longer periods. While the Helio G85 features two Cortex-A75 cores for a performance boost, the Snapdragon 680’s Kryo 265 Gold cores, clocked higher at 2.4 GHz, offer a more balanced and efficient performance profile. The A05s is better suited for sustained tasks and light gaming.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A05s boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 25W wired charging capability, compared to the Wiko T40’s 18W. While battery capacity isn’t specified for the Wiko T40, the A05s’ active use score of 11 hours and 32 minutes demonstrates solid battery life. The Snapdragon 680’s 6nm efficiency further contributes to longer runtimes. The Wiko T40 does offer reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the A05s, allowing it to act as a power bank for other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T40 if you prioritize reverse wired charging for topping up accessories and are comfortable with a slightly less refined software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A05s if you value a brighter, more visible display, faster charging speeds, and a more power-efficient chipset for extended battery life and smoother multitasking.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Galaxy A05s struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Snapdragon 680 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it's capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The 6nm process helps prevent excessive throttling during extended gaming sessions, offering a more consistent experience than the Wiko T40's Helio G85.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Wiko T40 significantly slower than the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A05s?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. 25W charging will replenish the Galaxy A05s' battery much faster, reducing downtime. Expect a 0-100% charge to take considerably longer on the Wiko T40.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A05s support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
Support for VoLTE and VoWiFi varies by carrier and region. It's crucial to check with your mobile provider to confirm compatibility with the Samsung Galaxy A05s before purchasing, as these features significantly enhance call quality and network connectivity.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Wiko T40 and the Samsung Galaxy A05s?
Samsung's One UI offers a more polished and feature-rich software experience compared to Wiko's typically more basic Android implementation. Samsung also provides more consistent software updates and security patches.
