The ultra-budget smartphone segment is fiercely competitive. The Wiko T30, powered by a modern Mediatek Dimensity 6300, enters the fray challenging the established Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, which relies on the older Unisoc SC9863A. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for the price-conscious consumer.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Wiko T30 emerges as the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset provides a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday tasks and even light gaming, justifying its potential price premium over the A03 Core.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 15 | 2021, November 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Available. Released 2021, December 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.8 x 78.1 x 8.5 mm (6.65 x 3.07 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.6 g (7.05 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Black, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A032F, SM-A032F/DS, SM-A032M |
| Price | - | £ 74.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.30 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.24 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) |
Wiko T30
- Significantly more powerful processor (Dimensity 6300)
- More efficient 6nm process for better battery life
- Faster 18W charging
- Brand recognition is lower than Samsung
- Potential software update support may be limited
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Established brand reputation (Samsung)
- Potentially wider availability
- Lower price point (likely)
- Outdated and significantly slower processor (Unisoc SC9863A)
- Less efficient 28nm process
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing power, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels. The A03 Core, typical of Samsung's entry-level offerings, likely prioritizes color accuracy over peak brightness. The Wiko T30, while also likely LCD, benefits from the processing power to potentially offer more sophisticated image processing for a slightly improved viewing experience. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, reflecting their budget positioning.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both devices likely feature basic camera setups. The A03 Core often includes a 5MP main sensor, while the Wiko T30's sensor resolution is unknown but likely similar or slightly better. The Dimensity 6300’s integrated image signal processor (ISP) in the Wiko T30 will likely offer superior image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction compared to the Unisoc SC9863A. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic and offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The performance gap is the defining characteristic of this comparison. The Wiko T30’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300, fabricated on a 6nm process, represents a substantial leap over the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). The Dimensity 6300’s octa-core configuration, featuring two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4GHz alongside six efficiency cores, provides significantly more processing power than the A03 Core’s four Cortex-A55 cores at 1.6GHz and another four at 1.2GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable user experience. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. While the mAh capacity isn't specified, the Unisoc SC9863A’s 28nm process is inherently less power-efficient than the Dimensity 6300’s 6nm process. This means the A03 Core will likely drain its battery faster under similar workloads. The Wiko T30’s 18W wired charging is a notable advantage, allowing for quicker top-ups compared to the A03 Core’s likely slower charging rate. The efficiency gains of the Dimensity 6300 will likely offset any potential difference in battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T30 if you prioritize performance and responsiveness for daily use, including social media, browsing, and streaming. It's ideal for users who want a phone that feels modern and won't struggle with common tasks. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core if your primary need is a basic, functional smartphone for calls, texts, and very light app usage, and you are on the absolute tightest budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Wiko T30 handle popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook smoothly?
Yes, the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 is more than capable of handling everyday apps like WhatsApp, Facebook, and web browsing without noticeable lag. The A03 Core's Unisoc chip may struggle with these tasks when multiple apps are open simultaneously.
❓ Is the Wiko T30 a good option for casual gaming?
The Wiko T30 is a better choice for casual gaming than the A03 Core. While it won't run demanding titles at high settings, the Dimensity 6300 provides enough power for less intensive games like puzzle games or simple racing games. The A03 Core will likely struggle with even basic games.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Wiko T30 with the 18W charger?
While a precise time isn't available, the 18W charging should fully charge the Wiko T30 in approximately 2-3 hours, depending on the battery capacity. This is significantly faster than the A03 Core's likely slower charging rate.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core receive regular software updates?
Samsung typically provides limited software updates for its entry-level A-series phones. Expect security patches for a limited time, but major Android version updates are unlikely. Wiko's update schedule is less predictable, but generally similar for this price segment.
