The Wiko T30 and Nokia C200 represent opposite ends of the ultra-budget smartphone spectrum. The Nokia C200 aims for extreme affordability, while the Wiko T30 attempts to offer a more modern experience with a significantly more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device provides the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Wiko T30 is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset offers a substantial performance leap over the Nokia C200’s Helio A22, making it far more capable for everyday tasks and even light gaming. While the Nokia C200 is cheaper, the performance deficit is too significant to ignore.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (2CA) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 15 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Available. Released 2022, Q2 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 168.8 x 78.1 x 8.5 mm (6.65 x 3.07 x 0.33 in) | 156.5 x 73.1 x 8.8 mm (6.16 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.6 g (7.05 oz) | 172.5 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | Splash protection |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.09 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~79.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Meteor Black |
| Models | - | TA-1437, TA-1510 |
| Price | - | About 60 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.11 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) |
Wiko T30
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- Faster 18W charging for quicker top-ups
- More efficient chipset potentially leading to better battery life
- Likely higher price point
- May have a less durable build quality (depending on materials)
Nokia C200
- Extremely affordable price
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Potentially longer battery life due to lower power consumption (though offset by slower charging)
- Very slow processor resulting in laggy performance
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited ability to run modern apps
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing power, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels. However, the Wiko T30’s more powerful chipset suggests a higher probability of a higher refresh rate display, even if only 60Hz, offering a smoother visual experience. The Nokia C200, with its focus on cost reduction, likely features a standard 60Hz panel. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, typical of this price bracket. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a strong point on either device.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset difference suggests the Wiko T30 will have a more capable image signal processor (ISP), leading to better image quality and faster processing. It’s reasonable to assume the Wiko T30 will feature a higher resolution main sensor. The Nokia C200’s Helio A22 is likely paired with a basic camera setup, and image processing will be limited. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device should be considered marketing filler rather than genuinely useful features.
Performance
The performance gap is the defining characteristic of this comparison. The Wiko T30’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300, built on a 6nm process, is a generational leap ahead of the Nokia C200’s 12nm Helio A22. The Dimensity 6300’s octa-core configuration (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) provides significantly more processing power than the Helio A22’s quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and the ability to handle more demanding applications. The 6nm node also implies better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling under sustained load. The Nokia C200 will struggle with even moderately demanding tasks.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Wiko T30’s 18W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Nokia C200’s 10W charging. This means the Wiko T30 will recharge significantly faster, reducing downtime. Even if the Nokia C200 has a slightly larger battery, the slower charging speed will be a noticeable inconvenience. The more efficient Dimensity 6300 in the Wiko T30 may also contribute to better overall battery life despite potentially having a smaller capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T30 if you prioritize a responsive user experience, smoother multitasking, and the ability to run modern apps without significant lag. It’s ideal for users who want a phone that feels relatively current. Buy the Nokia C200 if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and very light app usage – and you are on an extremely tight budget where every dollar counts. It’s best suited for first-time smartphone users or as a simple backup device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia C200 struggle with popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram?
Yes, the Nokia C200’s Helio A22 chipset is likely to exhibit noticeable lag and slowdown when running resource-intensive apps like Facebook and Instagram. Scrolling through feeds and loading images will be significantly slower compared to the Wiko T30.
❓ Can the Wiko T30 handle basic mobile games like Candy Crush or Angry Birds?
The Wiko T30’s Dimensity 6300 should handle casual mobile games like Candy Crush and Angry Birds without significant issues. However, more demanding 3D games may require reduced graphics settings to maintain a playable frame rate.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Nokia C200 realistically usable for daily charging?
While usable, the 10W charging on the Nokia C200 is quite slow. Expect a full charge to take several hours, making it less convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
❓ Does the Wiko T30 support software updates, and for how long?
Wiko’s software update track record is not as strong as Nokia’s. While the T30 will likely receive some initial updates, long-term support and major Android version upgrades are less certain compared to a Nokia device.
