The Wiko T3 and Tecno Spark 10C represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver essential functionality at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The Wiko T3 relies on the older Mediatek Helio P35, while the Tecno Spark 10C opts for the newer Unisoc T606. This comparison will dissect the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Tecno Spark 10C is the better choice. While both phones target the budget segment, the Unisoc T606’s more efficient CPU architecture and the inclusion of 18W charging provide a noticeable advantage in everyday performance and convenience, making it a more future-proof option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December | 2023, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December | Available. Released 2023, March 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76 x 9.2 mm (6.51 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 163.9 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, AF
5 MP
2 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold | Black, Blue, Green |
| Models | - | KI5k, KI5m |
| Price | - | ₹ 9,990 |
Wiko T3
- Established Mediatek chipset with potentially wider software support.
- Likely a more conservative software experience.
- Potentially lower price point (depending on retailer).
- Older, less efficient CPU architecture.
- Slower charging speeds.
- May struggle with multitasking and demanding apps.
Tecno Spark 10C
- More modern Unisoc T606 chipset with improved CPU performance.
- Faster 18W wired charging.
- Potentially better multitasking capabilities.
- Unisoc chipset may have less established software support.
- Tecno’s software can be more aggressive with notifications.
- May be slightly more expensive than the Wiko T3.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature 720p+ LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Without specific brightness or color gamut data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner. However, the absence of features like high refresh rates or even wide color gamut support on either device suggests a focus on cost reduction over visual fidelity. Expect adequate, but not impressive, viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both devices relying on basic sensor setups. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s safe to assume both will deliver acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low light. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit. Image processing will likely be the differentiating factor, and Tecno’s software tends to favor brighter, more saturated images, which may appeal to some users.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Wiko T3’s Mediatek Helio P35 utilizes a big.LITTLE architecture with four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. The Tecno Spark 10C’s Unisoc T606 employs a more modern design, featuring two Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores, also at 1.6 GHz. The A75 cores represent a significant architectural improvement over the A53, offering better single-core performance – crucial for app launch times and general responsiveness. While both are 12nm chips, the Unisoc T606’s architecture translates to a smoother user experience, particularly when multitasking. The T3 will likely struggle more with demanding apps or numerous open applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but both likely house around a 5000mAh battery, standard for this segment. However, the Tecno Spark 10C’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Wiko T3, which likely supports only 10W charging. This translates to a much faster 0-100% charge time, reducing downtime and increasing convenience. While a larger battery capacity is ideal, faster charging can mitigate the impact of a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T3 if you prioritize a known chipset with established software support, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a safe, if unexciting, option for basic smartphone tasks. Buy the Tecno Spark 10C if you value a more modern CPU architecture for improved multitasking and responsiveness, and appreciate the convenience of faster 18W charging. It’s the better choice for users who want a bit more performance for their money.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T606 in the Tecno Spark 10C handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Unisoc T606 can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at lower graphics settings (Balanced or Low) to maintain a stable frame rate. The Helio P35 in the Wiko T3 will likely struggle even at the lowest settings, resulting in a less enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ Is the software on the Tecno Spark 10C heavily customized with bloatware?
Tecno’s HiOS software is known for being heavily customized. Expect to find pre-installed apps (bloatware) that you may not need. However, many of these can be uninstalled. The Wiko T3 likely offers a cleaner Android experience, but may receive fewer software updates.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Tecno Spark 10C with the 18W charger?
With the included 18W charger, the Tecno Spark 10C should fully charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 2.5 to 3 hours, depending on usage during charging. The Wiko T3, with its likely 10W charging, will take considerably longer – potentially 4-5 hours.
❓ Does either phone support USB-C Power Delivery (PD) for faster charging with third-party chargers?
Neither the Wiko T3 nor the Tecno Spark 10C are expected to support USB-C Power Delivery. They will charge optimally with chargers that adhere to standard USB Power Delivery specifications, but won't benefit from the faster charging speeds offered by PD.
