The Wiko T3 and Samsung Galaxy A14 represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The Wiko T3 aims for affordability, while the Samsung Galaxy A14 attempts to deliver a more polished experience with potentially better performance and software support. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A14 is the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio G80 chipset (or Exynos 850 variant) offers a significant performance uplift over the Wiko T3’s Helio P35, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. While the Wiko T3 is cheaper, the A14’s added value justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76 x 9.2 mm (6.51 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, AF
5 MP
2 MP | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | - | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | - | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Wiko T3
- Lowest possible price point
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Compact size (likely)
- Significantly weaker performance
- Outdated chipset
- Limited software support
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Superior performance with Helio G80 or Exynos 850
- Larger display for better media consumption
- Samsung’s software ecosystem and updates
- Slightly higher price
- Slow 15W charging
- May include bloatware
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize 12nm chipsets, suggesting a focus on cost reduction over premium display features. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing for the Wiko T3, the Galaxy A14 likely features a standard LCD panel. The A14’s larger screen size (typically 6.6 inches vs. the T3’s likely smaller display) provides more screen real estate. Color accuracy and brightness are likely comparable, leaning towards the basic side, but the A14’s larger size is a clear advantage for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar in everyday scenarios, but the A14 has the potential for better image processing. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and multiple secondary sensors (often including a 2MP macro). However, the A14’s image signal processor (ISP), integrated within the Helio G80 or Exynos 850, is more advanced, allowing for better noise reduction and dynamic range. The Wiko T3’s ISP is less capable. While neither phone will compete with flagship camera systems, the A14 is likely to produce more consistently pleasing results, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The usefulness of the 2MP macro cameras on both devices is questionable due to their low resolution.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Samsung Galaxy A14, depending on the region, ships with either the Mediatek Helio G80 or the Exynos 850. The Helio G80, built on a 12nm process, features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A75 cores – compared to the Wiko T3’s Cortex-A53 cores. This translates to a roughly 30-40% performance increase in CPU-intensive tasks. The Exynos 850, built on an 8nm process, offers even better efficiency and sustained performance. The Wiko T3’s Helio P35, while an octa-core processor, is significantly older and less powerful. This difference will be noticeable in app loading times, multitasking, and gaming. The A14’s potential for smoother gaming experiences is a key advantage.
Battery Life
Battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. While specific battery capacities are missing for the Wiko T3, the Samsung Galaxy A14 typically features a 5000mAh battery. The Wiko T3 likely has a smaller capacity. The A14’s 15W charging is relatively slow, but the larger battery capacity provides ample endurance. The more efficient Helio G80 or Exynos 850 chipsets in the A14 will also contribute to longer battery life compared to the Wiko T3’s power-hungry Helio P35. Expect the A14 to comfortably last a full day of moderate use, while the T3 may require a midday top-up.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T3 if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and prioritize basic functionality like calls, texts, and light social media use. It’s a suitable option for first-time smartphone users or as a temporary device. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A14 if you value a smoother user experience, better performance for apps and games, and the reliability of Samsung’s software ecosystem. It’s ideal for users who want a phone that can handle everyday tasks without frustration.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 850 version of the Galaxy A14 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 850, built on an 8nm process, is relatively efficient and less prone to overheating compared to the Helio P35 in the Wiko T3. While it may get warm during extended gaming, it’s unlikely to experience significant thermal throttling, providing a more consistent gaming experience.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Unfortunately, the 2MP macro cameras on both the Wiko T3 and Samsung Galaxy A14 are largely marketing features. Their low resolution results in images lacking detail and sharpness. They are unlikely to produce satisfying close-up photos.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A14 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile at acceptable frame rates?
The Samsung Galaxy A14, particularly the Helio G80 variant, can run PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonably stable frame rates. While it won’t deliver a flagship-level gaming experience, it’s capable of providing an enjoyable gaming experience for casual players. The Wiko T3 will struggle with PUBG Mobile, likely requiring very low settings and experiencing significant frame drops.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Samsung Galaxy A14 with the included 15W charger?
With the included 15W charger, the Samsung Galaxy A14’s 5000mAh battery will take approximately 2.5 to 3 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%. While not the fastest charging speed, it’s sufficient for overnight charging.
