The Wiko T3 and Oppo A17k represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both devices rely on Mediatek’s Helio series of chipsets, but a subtle difference in the silicon – the Helio P35 in the Wiko T3 versus the Helio G35 in the Oppo A17k – warrants a closer look. This comparison will dissect the nuances of these processors to determine which phone offers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing slightly better gaming performance and potential for future software updates, the Oppo A17k emerges as the winner. While both phones share a similar core architecture, the Helio G35’s optimized GPU provides a marginal, but noticeable, advantage in graphics-intensive tasks. However, the Wiko T3 remains a viable option for basic smartphone use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December | 2022, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December | Available. Released 2022, October 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76 x 9.2 mm (6.51 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IPX4 water resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 48 MP, AF
5 MP
2 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | Yes | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold | Navy Blue, Gold |
| Models | - | CPH2471 |
| Price | - | About 130 EUR |
Wiko T3
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Mediatek Helio P35 is a proven chipset
- Less capable GPU compared to Helio G35
- Likely slower software updates
- May have less brand recognition
Oppo A17k
- Slightly better GPU performance (Helio G35)
- Potential for longer software support (Oppo)
- More established brand reputation
- May be slightly more expensive
- Similar CPU performance to Wiko T3
- Camera quality likely similar to Wiko T3
Display Comparison
Neither Wiko nor Oppo provide detailed display specifications beyond the basic resolution. Given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of information regarding peak brightness, color gamut coverage, or PWM dimming rates suggests a focus on cost reduction. Users sensitive to screen flicker should research independent reviews for PWM frequency data, as this is a critical factor for eye strain. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget positioning.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not a strong point for either device. While both likely feature a multi-camera setup, the emphasis is on quantity over quality. Detailed sensor information is missing, but it’s reasonable to assume the primary sensors are relatively small. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). Image processing will likely be basic, relying on software algorithms to enhance photos, but don’t expect flagship-level results.
Performance
Both the Wiko T3 and Oppo A17k are powered by Mediatek’s Helio series, utilizing an octa-core CPU configuration with the same core arrangement: four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.8 GHz. However, the Oppo A17k features the Helio G35, which incorporates a slightly more efficient GPU than the Helio P35 found in the Wiko T3. This translates to a modest improvement in graphics performance, making the A17k marginally better suited for light gaming. Both chipsets are fabricated on a 12nm process, indicating similar power efficiency characteristics. RAM speed and storage type (eMMC vs. UFS) are unknown, but likely represent further cost-saving measures.
Battery Life
Battery capacity and charging wattage are not specified in the provided data. Given the target market, both devices likely feature a battery capacity in the 4000-5000 mAh range. Charging speeds are expected to be relatively slow, potentially utilizing a 10W or 15W charger. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but both phones should comfortably last a full day with moderate use. The absence of fast charging support is a common trade-off in this price segment.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T3 if you need a reliable, no-frills smartphone for essential tasks like calling, texting, and light social media browsing, and prioritize minimizing upfront cost. Buy the Oppo A17k if you prefer a device capable of handling slightly more demanding applications, enjoy occasional mobile gaming, and value the potential for longer-term software support from a more established brand.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A17k handle games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G35 in the Oppo A17k offers a slight advantage in graphics performance, allowing for playable frame rates in PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at low to medium settings. However, don't expect a smooth, high-fidelity gaming experience. The Wiko T3 will struggle more with these titles.
❓ How long will the software support last on the Wiko T3 compared to the Oppo A17k?
Oppo generally provides longer software support cycles than Wiko. While neither device is likely to receive major Android version updates for an extended period, the Oppo A17k is more likely to receive security patches and minor updates for a longer duration, enhancing its long-term usability.
❓ Is the difference between the Helio P35 and Helio G35 significant enough to justify paying extra for the Oppo A17k?
The difference is incremental, not revolutionary. The Helio G35’s GPU provides a modest performance boost, primarily benefiting gaming and graphics-intensive apps. If you’re a casual user, the Wiko T3 is sufficient. However, if you occasionally game or use demanding apps, the A17k’s extra performance is worthwhile.
