Both the Wiko T3 and Motorola Moto G32 target the budget-conscious smartphone user, but they approach this segment with vastly different internal hardware. The Wiko T3 relies on the older Mediatek Helio P35, while the Moto G32 features the more modern Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. This comparison dissects the implications of these chipset choices, revealing where each phone excels and who will benefit most from each device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G32 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, delivers superior performance and significantly better power efficiency compared to the Wiko T3’s 12nm Helio P35. The 30W charging is a bonus, making the Moto G32 a more compelling overall package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December | 2022, July 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December | Available. Released 2022, August 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76 x 9.2 mm (6.51 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, AF
5 MP
2 MP | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro/depth) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold | Mineral Grey, Satin Silver, Rose Gold |
| Models | - | XT2235-2, XT2235-3 |
| Price | - | ₹ 8,990 |
Wiko T3
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- May be more readily available in certain regions
- Outdated Helio P35 chipset
- Poor performance in demanding tasks
- Lower power efficiency
- Likely slower charging speeds
Motorola Moto G32
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Better performance for gaming and multitasking
- Improved image processing capabilities
- Slightly higher price point
- May not be available in all markets
- Potentially larger physical size
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely utilize LCD panels. The Moto G32, being a newer device, may benefit from improved color calibration and potentially higher peak brightness. The Wiko T3, being an older model, may exhibit wider bezels and less accurate color reproduction. Without specific nit ratings or panel technology details, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is challenging. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature modest camera systems. The Snapdragon 680’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more advanced than the Helio P35’s, potentially leading to better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The Moto G32 is more likely to offer features like improved HDR and noise reduction. The presence of a 30W charger on the Moto G32 suggests a more modern overall design, potentially extending to camera module quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G32’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Wiko T3’s Mediatek Helio P35 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to longer battery life and less heat generation. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 680 utilizes Kryo 265 Gold and Silver cores clocked up to 2.4 GHz, offering a performance advantage over the Helio P35’s Cortex-A53 cores peaking at 2.3 GHz. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications and multitasking. The Snapdragon 680’s Adreno GPU also provides a more capable graphics experience for gaming.
Battery Life
While the battery capacities aren't specified, the Snapdragon 680’s superior power efficiency gives the Moto G32 a significant advantage in real-world battery life. The 30W wired charging on the Moto G32 is a major benefit, allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the Wiko T3, which likely supports a slower charging standard. A full charge on the Moto G32 could take under an hour, while the Wiko T3 may require several hours.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T3 if your primary need is a basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and you prioritize minimizing upfront cost above all else. Buy the Motorola Moto G32 if you value smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, longer battery life, and faster charging, even if it means a slightly higher initial investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Moto G32 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 680 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it provides a significantly smoother experience than the Helio P35 in the Wiko T3, which would likely struggle with consistent performance even at lower settings.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Absolutely. While both phones can handle basic tasks, the Snapdragon 680 in the Moto G32 offers a snappier and more responsive experience. App loading times will be faster, multitasking will be smoother, and scrolling through social media feeds will feel less laggy compared to the Wiko T3.
❓ How much faster is the 30W charging on the Moto G32 compared to the Wiko T3?
The Wiko T3 likely supports standard 10W or 15W charging. The Moto G32’s 30W charging can reduce charging times by 50% or more. Expect a full charge on the Moto G32 in under an hour, while the Wiko T3 could take 3-4 hours or longer.
