The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Wiko T20 and Xiaomi Redmi 10C both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point. However, they take drastically different approaches to achieving this, primarily in their chipset choices. This comparison will dissect those differences and determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Redmi 10C is the superior choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 680, built on a more efficient 6nm process, delivers significantly better performance and responsiveness than the Wiko T20’s Unisoc SC9863A1. While the Wiko T20 may offer a slightly lower initial price, the Redmi 10C’s improved user experience justifies the small premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2022, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 169.6 x 76.6 x 8.3 mm (6.68 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Blue | Graphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint Green |
| Models | - | 220333QAG, 220333QBI, 220333QNY, 220333QL |
| Price | About 120 EUR | £ 99.00 / € 109.86 |
| SAR | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
Wiko T20
- Potentially lower initial price
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- May have longer standby time due to less powerful processor
- Significantly slower performance
- Less efficient processor leads to potential throttling
- Slower charging speed
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
- Faster and more responsive performance
- More efficient processor for better battery life
- Faster 18W charging
- Qualcomm ISP for potentially better image processing
- Slightly higher price
- May not offer significantly better display quality
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. However, details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable. The focus here is on the internal hardware, as display quality is unlikely to be a deciding factor. Bezels are expected to be relatively thick on both, typical for this price range.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The Redmi 10C likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which generally provides better image processing capabilities than those found in Unisoc chipsets. This could result in slightly better dynamic range and noise reduction in photos taken with the Redmi 10C. The prevalence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both devices suggests these are largely marketing features and won't significantly impact image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi 10C’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Wiko T20’s Unisoc SC9863A1 (22nm). The 6nm process node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to less heat and more sustained performance. The Snapdragon 680’s CPU configuration – 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver – also offers a significant clock speed advantage over the Wiko’s 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55. This means faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable overall experience on the Redmi 10C. The Unisoc chip, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Redmi 10C’s 18W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Wiko T20’s 10W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed will significantly reduce the time spent tethered to a wall outlet. The Snapdragon 680’s superior power efficiency also contributes to potentially longer battery life on the Redmi 10C, even with a similar capacity battery. Expect the Redmi 10C to reach a full charge considerably faster than the Wiko T20.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T20 if your primary need is a basic, functional smartphone for minimal tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and you are extremely price-sensitive. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10C if you prioritize a smoother, more responsive user experience, occasional gaming, and a more future-proof platform, even if it means spending a little more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc SC9863A1 in the Wiko T20 struggle with popular apps like TikTok or Facebook?
Yes, the Unisoc SC9863A1 is a relatively low-end processor. While it can run these apps, you may experience noticeable lag, slow loading times, and occasional stutters, especially when multitasking. The Redmi 10C’s Snapdragon 680 will provide a much smoother experience.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Redmi 10C a significant improvement over the Wiko T20’s 10W charging?
Absolutely. 18W charging will drastically reduce the time it takes to fully charge the Redmi 10C. Expect a 0-100% charge to be completed in significantly less time compared to the Wiko T20, which will likely take over 3 hours.
❓ Can the Xiaomi Redmi 10C handle basic mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Redmi 10C can run these games, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve playable frame rates. The Snapdragon 680 is capable, but it’s not a gaming powerhouse. The Wiko T20 will struggle even at the lowest settings.
