Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Wiko T10 and Samsung Galaxy A03s are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A03s edges out the Wiko T10 thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset, better display brightness, and the Samsung brand reputation. While both are budget options, the A03s provides a more polished and reliable experience overall.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - W-V673-01 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 26, 28, 38, 66 - W-V673-01 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - W-V673-02 | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A037U |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 26 | 2021, August 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 26 | Available. Released 2021, August 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 Core |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | W-V673-01, W-V673-02 | SM-A037F, SM-A037F/DS, SM-A037M, SM-A037G, SM-A037U, SM-S134DL, SM-A037W, SM-A037U1, SM-S135DL |
| Price | - | $ 65.65 / £ 82.99 / ₹ 10,800 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.36 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 122h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1718:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 103465 (v8), 101299 (v9)
GeekBench: 889 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 5.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko T10
- Very affordable
- Decent battery life
- Lightweight design
- Lower performance
- Dim display
- Limited camera capabilities
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Better performance
- Brighter display
- Samsung brand reliability
- 15W charging
- Slightly more expensive
- Still a budget phone with limitations
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A03s boasts a measured peak brightness of 488 nits, significantly brighter than the Wiko T10's likely lower brightness. Both offer a 1718:1 contrast ratio, indicating good black levels, but the A03s's brightness advantage makes it more usable outdoors. Both likely feature similar LCD panels with HD+ resolution.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is generally comparable on both devices, as both are budget phones. Expect decent daytime shots but limited low-light performance. The Samsung's software processing might offer slightly better results. Both likely feature a primary camera and a depth sensor.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A03s's Mediatek Helio P35 with an octa-core CPU provides a noticeable performance boost over the Wiko T10's Helio A22 quad-core processor. Expect smoother multitasking and slightly faster app loading times on the A03s. Both phones will struggle with demanding games.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive battery life, with the Samsung Galaxy A03s achieving an endurance rating of 122 hours. The Wiko T10 likely offers similar endurance, though specific testing data is limited. Both should easily last a full day of moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Wiko T10 is a good choice for users prioritizing the absolute lowest price and basic functionality. The Samsung Galaxy A03s is ideal for those seeking a slightly better performance, a brighter display, and the reliability of a well-known brand, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A03s, with its octa-core processor, will handle games slightly better than the Wiko T10's quad-core chip, although neither is designed for high-end gaming.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A03s worth the extra cost?
Yes, if you value a smoother user experience, a brighter display, and the reliability of the Samsung brand, the A03s is a worthwhile upgrade over the Wiko T10.
