The Wiko T10 and Nokia G21 represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at an accessible price, but they take different approaches. The Wiko T10 relies on a tried-and-true, if older, MediaTek chipset, while the Nokia G21 opts for the newer Unisoc T606. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia G21 is the better choice. Its Unisoc T606 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Wiko T10’s Helio A22, offering a smoother experience for multitasking and app usage. While both boast similar battery endurance, the Nokia G21’s 18W charging with PD3.0 support is a significant advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - W-V673-01 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 26, 28, 38, 66 - W-V673-01 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - W-V673-02 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 40, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 26 | 2022, February 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 26 | Available. Released 2022, February 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 164.6 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | Yes | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5050 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Nordic Blue, Dusk |
| Models | W-V673-01, W-V673-02 | TA-1418, TA-1477, TA-1415, TA-1405, TA-1404, TA-1412 |
| Price | - | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.34 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1631:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.7 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 171299 (v9)
GeekBench: 1193 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko T10
- Extremely affordable price point
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Outdated and underpowered processor
- Limited multitasking capabilities
- Likely slow charging speeds
Nokia G21
- More powerful Unisoc T606 chipset
- Faster 18W charging with PD3.0
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Still a budget device with limitations
- Camera performance likely average
- May be slightly more expensive than the Wiko T10
Display Comparison
Both the Wiko T10 and Nokia G21 share a contrast ratio of 1631:1, suggesting similar panel characteristics in terms of black levels. However, the Nokia G21 boasts a measured peak brightness of 500 nits, a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility. While neither device is expected to offer exceptional color accuracy, the higher brightness of the Nokia G21 makes it the more practical choice for everyday use in varying lighting conditions. The lack of information regarding panel type (IPS vs. VA) for the Wiko T10 makes a definitive comparison of viewing angles difficult.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a meaningful comparison. However, given the price point, it’s safe to assume both cameras will perform adequately in good lighting conditions but struggle in low light. The absence of details regarding aperture or sensor size suggests neither device will excel in photography. Focusing on the chipset, the Nokia G21’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Unisoc T606 likely offers more advanced image processing capabilities than the ISP in the Helio A22, potentially resulting in slightly better image quality.
Performance
The Nokia G21’s Unisoc T606 is the clear winner in the performance category. Its octa-core configuration, featuring two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores, provides a substantial advantage over the Wiko T10’s quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 processor. The A75 cores offer significantly better single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and responsiveness. While the clock speed of the A53 is higher, the architectural improvements in the T606’s cores translate to a smoother overall experience, especially when multitasking. The 12nm process node is shared by both chipsets, so thermal throttling shouldn't be a major differentiator.
Battery Life
Both the Wiko T10 and Nokia G21 achieve an endurance rating of 126 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Nokia G21’s 18W wired charging with PD3.0 support is a significant advantage. This allows for faster charging times compared to the Wiko T10, which likely supports a slower, non-PD charging standard. While both phones will likely last a full day on a single charge for moderate users, the Nokia G21’s faster charging capability minimizes downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T10 if your primary need is an extremely basic smartphone for calls, texts, and light app usage, and you prioritize absolute simplicity. Buy the Nokia G21 if you want a more responsive device capable of handling social media, streaming video, and occasional gaming, and you value faster charging and a slightly more modern feature set.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia G21 handle popular social media apps like TikTok and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Unisoc T606 chipset in the Nokia G21 is significantly more capable than the Helio A22 in the Wiko T10. It should provide a smoother experience when scrolling through feeds, recording videos, and using social media apps without noticeable lag.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Nokia G21 a significant improvement over the Wiko T10's charging speed?
Absolutely. While the Wiko T10 likely supports standard 5W or 10W charging, the Nokia G21’s 18W charging with PD3.0 will dramatically reduce charging times. Expect a much faster top-up, getting you back to using your phone quicker.
❓ Can the Nokia G21 handle basic mobile games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers?
Yes, the Nokia G21 should handle casual mobile games like Candy Crush and Subway Surfers without issue. The Unisoc T606 provides enough processing power for these less demanding titles. However, don't expect to play graphically intensive games at high settings.
❓ How does the Unisoc T606 compare to the MediaTek Helio A22 in terms of long-term software support?
Nokia generally provides better software support and updates than Wiko. While neither phone is guaranteed years of updates, the Nokia G21 is more likely to receive security patches and potentially even a software version upgrade, extending its usable lifespan.
