The Wiko Sunny5 and Nokia C200 represent the absolute bottom end of the smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability above all else. Both devices run Android Go edition, optimized for limited hardware. However, beneath the surface, key differences in chipset architecture and specifications dictate a noticeable disparity in performance and user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia C200 offers a better experience thanks to its more modern and powerful Mediatek Helio A22 chipset. While the Wiko Sunny5 is likely cheaper, the performance gains of the C200 justify the potential price difference, resulting in a smoother, more responsive user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | - | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | HSPA, LTE (2CA) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September. Released 2020, September | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, Q2 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 161 x 77.6 x 9 mm (6.34 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 156.5 x 73.1 x 8.8 mm (6.16 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 166 g (5.86 oz) | 172.5 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | Splash protection |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 960 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~179 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.99 inches, 92.6 cm2 (~74.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.09 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~79.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T820 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go Edition) | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 480p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gold, Green | Meteor Black |
| Models | - | TA-1437, TA-1510 |
| Price | About 60 EUR | About 60 EUR |
| SAR | 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.69 W/kg (body) | 1.11 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) |
Wiko Sunny5
- Likely the most affordable option.
- Simple and easy to use.
- Android Go edition for optimized performance on limited hardware.
- Significantly slower processor.
- Older ARM architecture.
- Likely lower quality display.
Nokia C200
- More powerful Mediatek Helio A22 chipset.
- More efficient Cortex-A53 cores.
- 10W wired charging.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Still limited by its budget nature.
- Camera performance likely basic.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Specifications are absent for the Wiko Sunny5, but given its price point, it likely features a low-resolution LCD panel. The Nokia C200 also utilizes an LCD, but details regarding brightness and color accuracy are unavailable. Both will likely struggle in direct sunlight. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but on basic readability.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited. Details are scarce, but both are likely to feature basic sensors. The Nokia C200’s camera specifications are unavailable, but given the segment, it's unlikely to feature advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS). Expect passable photos in good lighting conditions, but significant noise and lack of detail in low light. The Wiko Sunny5’s camera is similarly expected to be basic, prioritizing functionality over quality.
Performance
This is where the Nokia C200 pulls ahead significantly. The Wiko Sunny5’s quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 processor is based on an older ARM architecture. In contrast, the Nokia C200’s Mediatek Helio A22 (12nm) features quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The A53 architecture is substantially more efficient and powerful than the A7, and the 12nm manufacturing process further enhances performance and efficiency. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience on the Nokia C200. The higher clock speed of the C200’s CPU is also a key advantage.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Nokia C200 includes 10W wired charging, which, while slow, is a benefit over a potentially non-standard or slower charging solution on the Wiko Sunny5. Given the less demanding chipset, the Nokia C200 is likely to offer comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity, due to its improved power efficiency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko Sunny5 if your absolute priority is the lowest possible price and you only need a phone for basic communication – calls and texts. It's suitable for users who rarely use apps. Buy the Nokia C200 if you want a more responsive experience, even for light multitasking, and appreciate the benefits of a more modern chipset, even within the budget segment. It's a better choice for those who occasionally browse the web or use social media.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek Helio A22 chipset capable of running popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook smoothly on the Nokia C200?
Yes, the Helio A22 is sufficient for running lightweight apps like WhatsApp and Facebook without significant lag. While it won't handle demanding games or multitasking, it provides a noticeably smoother experience than the older Cortex-A7 found in the Wiko Sunny5 for these common tasks.
❓ Does the Wiko Sunny5 receive regular security updates, given its price point?
Security updates are unlikely to be frequent or guaranteed on the Wiko Sunny5. Budget devices often receive limited software support. The Nokia C200, benefiting from Nokia's brand commitment, *may* receive more consistent updates, though even that is not guaranteed in this price segment.
❓ What version of Android does each phone run, and how does that impact performance?
Both phones run Android Go edition, a stripped-down version of Android designed for devices with limited RAM and processing power. Android Go reduces bloatware and optimizes apps for lower-end hardware, improving performance on both devices. However, the more powerful chipset in the Nokia C200 allows it to handle the Android Go operating system more efficiently.
