Wiko Sunny3 vs BLU Vivo Go: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

The Wiko Sunny3 and BLU Vivo Go represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum, targeting users who prioritize affordability above all else. Both devices aim to deliver a functional smartphone experience without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with different hardware approaches. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user seeking a slightly more responsive experience, the BLU Vivo Go emerges as the better choice. Its Mediatek MT6739 chipset, featuring Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz, provides a noticeable performance edge over the Wiko Sunny3’s 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 processor, making everyday tasks smoother.

PHONES
Phone Names Wiko Sunny3 BLU Vivo Go
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands-1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 17, 28
SpeedHSPA 21.1/5.76 MbpsHSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPAGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2019, Q1. Released 2019, Q12018, December. Released 2018, December
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions146.7 x 74 x 10 mm (5.78 x 2.91 x 0.39 in)156.7 x 75.2 x 8.4 mm (6.17 x 2.96 x 0.33 in)
SIMDual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by)Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight140 g (4.94 oz)155 g (5.47 oz)
Display
Resolution480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~196 ppi density)720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~268 ppi density)
Size5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~63.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~78.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFT LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUQuad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53
Chipset-Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm)
GPUMali-T820 MP1PowerVR GE8100
OSAndroid 8.0 Oreo (Go edition)Android 9.0 Pie (Go edition)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC
Internal8GB 512MB RAM16GB 1GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual-8 MP, AF Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash
Single5 MP-
Video720p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-LED flash
Single2 MP5 MP
Video-720p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP, LE4.1, A2DP
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/nWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
LanguagesAnthracite, Gold, Silver, Bleen, Cherry Red-
SensorsAccelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Stand-by-Up to 600 h (2G) / Up to 550 h (3G)
Talk time-Up to 21 h (2G) / Up to 16 h (3G)
TypeLi-Ion 2000 mAh, removableLi-Po 2600 mAh, non-removable
Misc
Colors-Black
Price-About 70 EUR
SAR EU0.48 W/kg (head)     1.80 W/kg (body)-

Wiko Sunny3

  • Potentially simpler software experience.
  • May be more readily available in certain regions.
  • Focus on essential functionality.

  • Older Cortex-A7 processor offers limited performance.
  • Lack of detailed specifications makes it difficult to assess overall quality.
  • Likely inferior multitasking capabilities.

BLU Vivo Go

  • More modern Cortex-A53 processor provides a performance boost.
  • MT6739 chipset offers a slightly more efficient architecture.
  • Potentially better camera image processing.

  • 2MP macro camera is likely of limited use.
  • Still an entry-level device with inherent limitations.
  • Software support may be limited.

Display Comparison

Neither Wiko nor BLU provide display specifications beyond size, leaving brightness, color accuracy, and panel type largely unknown. Given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with modest resolutions. The absence of detailed display information suggests neither device prioritizes visual fidelity, focusing instead on cost reduction. Expect similar viewing experiences in typical indoor lighting conditions.

Camera Comparison

Both devices likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without detailed sensor information, it’s safe to assume both rely on low-resolution sensors. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the BLU Vivo Go is largely a marketing tactic, as image quality will be limited. Real-world image quality will depend heavily on software processing, but the MT6739’s slightly more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) may offer a marginal advantage in image clarity and processing speed.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipset. The BLU Vivo Go’s Mediatek MT6739, built on a 28nm process, boasts a quad-core Cortex-A53 CPU clocked at 1.5 GHz. This represents a significant architectural upgrade over the Wiko Sunny3’s quad-core Cortex-A7 at 1.3 GHz. Cortex-A53 cores are demonstrably more efficient and offer higher single-core performance than the older A7 architecture. While both are entry-level CPUs, the MT6739 will handle multitasking and app loading with less lag. The 28nm process node also suggests slightly better power efficiency compared to an unknown process for the Wiko's CPU.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given the low-power CPUs and basic displays, both should offer at least a full day of moderate use. Charging wattage is also unknown, suggesting both likely ship with standard 5W chargers. Expect 2-3 hours to fully charge from 0-100%.

Buying Guide

Buy the Wiko Sunny3 if you need a basic, functional smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light web browsing, and prioritize simplicity. Buy the BLU Vivo Go if you prefer a device capable of handling slightly more demanding applications, such as social media and basic gaming, and appreciate a marginally faster processor for a smoother user experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the BLU Vivo Go handle popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
The Mediatek MT6739 chipset in the BLU Vivo Go should provide a reasonably smooth experience with Facebook and Instagram. While not ideal for intensive gaming, the Cortex-A53 cores are capable of handling the demands of these apps without significant lag, offering a better experience than the Wiko Sunny3's older processor.
❓ Is the Wiko Sunny3 a good choice for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Yes, the Wiko Sunny3 is a suitable option for users who primarily need a phone for basic communication. Its Cortex-A7 processor is sufficient for making calls, sending texts, and managing contacts. However, it will struggle with more demanding tasks.
❓ Can either of these phones run multiple apps simultaneously without slowing down?
Multitasking will be limited on both devices due to their low RAM capacity (likely 1GB or 2GB, though not specified). The BLU Vivo Go, with its more efficient MT6739 chipset, will handle a slightly higher number of apps before experiencing significant slowdown compared to the Wiko Sunny3.