Looking for an affordable smartphone? Wiko offers several options, and the Power U20 and Y52 are two popular contenders. But which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison breaks down their key features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Wiko Power U20 clearly edges out the Y52 thanks to its significantly more powerful processor and larger battery. While the Y52 is a budget-friendly option, the U20 delivers a smoother experience and longer battery life, making it the better overall choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | CDMA 800 / 1700 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 7, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June | 2021, November |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June | Available. Released 2021, November |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 173.8 x 78.6 x 9.5 mm (6.84 x 3.09 x 0.37 in) | 143.2 x 73.5 x 10.2 mm (5.64 x 2.89 x 0.40 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 153 g (5.40 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~270 ppi density) | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~196 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~65.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TN LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 1.4 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Triple | 13 MP, AF
2 MP
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 2020 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Slate Grey, Navy Blue, Mint | Grey, Deep Blue, Green |
| Models | W-V750BN-EEA | W-K521-EEA |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 50 EUR |
| SAR | 0.58 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | 0.75 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
Wiko Power U20
- More powerful processor
- Larger battery capacity
- Likely better camera system
- More RAM (likely 3/4GB)
- Potentially more storage
- Slightly higher price
- Design might be less premium
Wiko Y52
- Lower price point
- Compact design (potentially)
- Lightweight
- Weaker processor
- Smaller battery
- Less RAM (likely 2GB)
- Limited storage
- Slower performance
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD displays, probably around 6.5 inches with HD+ resolution. The Power U20 might offer slightly better color accuracy due to its more powerful chipset allowing for better image processing, but the difference will be minimal. Expect similar viewing angles and brightness levels.
Camera Comparison
The Power U20 likely has a more versatile camera setup, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and additional lenses (macro, depth). While both phones will produce acceptable photos in good lighting, the U20 should offer better detail and dynamic range. Low-light performance will likely be better on the U20 as well.
Performance
This is where the Power U20 shines. The Mediatek Helio G35, with its octa-core processor, is considerably faster than the Y52's quad-core Unisoc SC9832E. Expect smoother app loading, faster multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the U20. The Y52 will struggle with demanding apps and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Power U20's name suggests a larger battery capacity, likely around 6000mAh, compared to the Y52's probably around 4000mAh. This translates to significantly longer battery life on the U20, easily lasting a full day or more with moderate usage. The Y52 will require more frequent charging.
Buying Guide
The Wiko Power U20 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and battery life, even on a budget. It's suitable for light gaming, multitasking, and extended usage. The Wiko Y52 is best for users with very basic needs – calls, texts, and occasional social media browsing – and who are extremely price-sensitive.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Wiko Power U20 good for gaming?
The Wiko Power U20's Helio G35 chipset can handle light gaming, but don't expect high frame rates or demanding graphics. It's suitable for casual games.
❓ How much storage do these phones have?
The Wiko Power U20 likely offers 32GB or 64GB of storage, while the Y52 probably has 32GB. Both phones likely support microSD card expansion.
