Looking for a reliable smartphone without breaking the bank? The Wiko Power U20 and Oppo A92 are both contenders in the budget phone arena, offering impressive features for their price. But which one truly delivers the best experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A92 generally edges out the Wiko Power U20 thanks to its superior chipset, slightly faster performance, and more refined software experience. While the Wiko boasts a massive battery, the Oppo's overall package makes it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | CDMA 800 / 1700 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Southeast Asia |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June | 2020, May 04. Released 2020, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 173.8 x 78.6 x 9.5 mm (6.84 x 3.09 x 0.37 in) | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens
2 MP B/W, f/2.4 |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, AF
2 MP
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Slate Grey, Navy Blue, Mint | Twilight Black, Stream White, Aurora Purple |
| Models | W-V750BN-EEA | CPH2059 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 0.58 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | - |
Wiko Power U20
- Exceptional battery life
- Very affordable
- Large display
- Decent storage
- Lower performance
- Less refined design
- Potentially lower screen resolution
- Basic camera system
Oppo A92
- Better performance (Snapdragon 665)
- Improved camera quality
- More polished design
- Faster charging (18W)
- Shorter battery life than Wiko
- Slightly more expensive
- May lack some niche features
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large 6.5-inch displays, but the Oppo A92 typically has a slightly better panel with more accurate colors and potentially a higher resolution (likely 1080 x 2400 vs. potentially 720 x 1600 on the Wiko). Viewing angles and brightness are likely to be better on the Oppo.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo A92 generally has a more versatile camera system, often including a dedicated ultrawide lens and better image processing. While both offer decent image quality in good lighting, the Oppo will likely perform better in low-light conditions and offer more creative shooting options.
Performance
The Oppo A92's Snapdragon 665 chipset is significantly more powerful than the Wiko Power U20's Helio G35. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Oppo. The Snapdragon 665 also benefits from Qualcomm's optimized software support.
Battery Life
The Wiko Power U20's standout feature is its massive battery capacity (likely 6000mAh). This translates to exceptional battery life, easily lasting two days on a single charge. The Oppo A92 has a respectable battery (likely 5000mAh), but won't match the Wiko's endurance.
Buying Guide
The Wiko Power U20 is ideal for users prioritizing battery life above all else and needing a very affordable device. The Oppo A92 is a better fit for those seeking a smoother, more responsive experience with a better camera and a more polished design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo A92 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 665 chipset. The Wiko Power U20 can handle basic games, but will struggle with more demanding titles.
❓ How long will the Wiko Power U20's battery last?
The Wiko Power U20's battery is its biggest strength, typically lasting 2+ days with moderate usage. Heavy users can still expect a full day of use.
❓ Does the Oppo A92 have a microSD card slot?
Yes, the Oppo A92 typically includes a microSD card slot for expandable storage.
