The Samsung Galaxy A25 and Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at accessible price points, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. This comparison dissects these differences, focusing on performance, display quality, and battery life to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A25 emerges as the superior choice. Its Exynos 1280 chipset, coupled with a significantly brighter 1030 nit display, provides a smoother and more visually engaging experience. While the Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s offers a respectable Dimensity 700, the A25’s overall refinement justifies the potential price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 07 | 2023, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 07 | Available. Released 2023, December 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 77.7 x 9 mm (6.63 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 161 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm (6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB, 256GB | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Market/region dependent |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue |
| Models | GAR-AN60 | SM-A256E, SM-A256E/DS, SM-A256E/DSN, SM-A256B, SM-A256B/DS, SM-A256B/DSN, SM-A256U, SM-A256U1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 175.99 / $ 120.32 / ₹ 18,399 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s
- Brighter and more vibrant display (1030 nits)
- More powerful and efficient Exynos 1280 chipset
- Likely superior camera performance
- Longer battery life (10:19h active use)
- Potentially higher price point
- May lack expandable storage (depending on variant)
Samsung Galaxy A25
- Lower upfront cost
- 5G connectivity
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Acceptable charging speed (22.5W)
- Diminished display brightness
- Less powerful Dimensity 700 chipset
- Likely inferior camera quality
- Potentially shorter battery life
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A25 boasts a substantial advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1030 nits. This is a critical difference, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s’ display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls significantly below this level, impacting outdoor usability. Samsung’s display technology typically offers superior color accuracy and viewing angles, further enhancing the user experience. The lack of LTPO on either device suggests standard refresh rates, but the A25’s brightness is the defining factor.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are limited. However, given Samsung’s established camera expertise, the Galaxy A25 is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While both likely feature multi-camera setups, the A25’s image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor size (assumed based on Samsung’s typical implementation) will likely result in more detailed and dynamic photos and videos. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A25, a common feature in Samsung’s A-series, would further enhance video stability and low-light performance. We can assume the 2MP macro lens on the Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s will offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core performance difference lies in the chipsets: the Samsung Galaxy A25 utilizes the Exynos 1280 (5nm), while the Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 offers improved power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 7nm Dimensity 700. Both CPUs feature an octa-core configuration with similar Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, but the A25’s Cortex-A78 performance cores (2.4 GHz) are clocked higher than the Hi Enjoy 60s’ Cortex-A76 cores (2.2 GHz), translating to faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The A25 is likely to handle demanding games with higher frame rates and fewer stutters.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A25 provides a real-world active use battery score of 10:19 hours, demonstrating solid endurance. While the Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s’ battery capacity is unknown, the A25’s more efficient Exynos 1280 chipset and optimized software contribute to its longer runtime. Both devices support fast charging, with the A25 offering 25W wired charging and the Hi Enjoy 60s at 22.5W. The slightly faster charging speed of the A25 will reduce downtime, but the overall battery experience is more heavily influenced by the chipset’s efficiency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s if you prioritize a lower upfront cost and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A25 if you value a brighter, more vibrant display, smoother performance for multitasking and gaming, and a more polished software experience, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A25 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1280, built on a 5nm process, is generally efficient and well-managed in the Galaxy A25. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, the A25’s thermal design should prevent significant throttling, allowing for sustained performance. It's unlikely to reach critical temperatures under normal use.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Unfortunately, 2MP macro cameras are often more of a marketing feature than a genuinely useful tool. The low resolution typically results in soft, lacking detail in close-up shots. While it can capture a very close focus, the image quality will likely be disappointing compared to using the main camera with digital zoom.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A25 reliably run PUBG Mobile at 60fps with high graphics settings?
The Exynos 1280 chipset in the Galaxy A25 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at 60fps with high graphics settings, but performance may vary depending on the specific game version and background processes. Expect a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience, though occasional frame drops might occur during intense firefights.
