Google Pixel 7a vs. Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Google Tensor G2 chipset delivers significantly faster performance and unlocks advanced features like AI-powered camera processing. While the Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s offers a budget-friendly 5G experience, it compromises heavily on processing power and camera quality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 07 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 07 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 77.7 x 9 mm (6.63 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB, 256GB | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | GAR-AN60 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s
- Superior performance with Google Tensor G2
- Exceptional camera quality and AI features
- Brighter and more vibrant OLED display
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Higher price point
Google Pixel 7a
- More affordable price
- Faster wired charging (22.5W)
- 5G connectivity
- Significantly weaker performance
- Inferior camera quality
- Likely lower display quality
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1070 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Wiko's panel specifications are unknown, it's likely to be an LCD, whereas the Pixel 7a utilizes an OLED panel, offering superior contrast and color accuracy. The absence of details regarding refresh rate on the Wiko suggests a standard 60Hz panel, while the Pixel 7a is expected to have a 90Hz panel, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a clear standout. While specific sensor details are not provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in low-light photography and offers features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. The Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s’ camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a meaningful comparison, but given its price point, it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 7a’s image quality or feature set. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, with features like Cinematic Pan and 4K recording.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Google Pixel 7a is powered by the Google Tensor G2 (5nm), while the Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s uses the MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Tensor G2’s 5nm fabrication process is more efficient, and its CPU architecture – featuring Cortex-X1 cores – provides a substantial performance advantage over the Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores. The Pixel 7a’s CPU clock speeds (2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2.35 GHz Cortex-A78) are also higher, resulting in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The Tensor G2 also includes a dedicated TPU for accelerating AI tasks, enhancing features like image processing and voice recognition. The Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s will be adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding games or applications.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, suggesting good battery life despite its 18W wired and 7.5W wireless charging capabilities. The Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s offers faster 22.5W wired charging, potentially allowing for quicker top-ups, but its battery capacity is unknown. The Pixel 7a’s PD3.0 support also offers more versatile charging options. The Tensor G2’s efficiency, combined with Google’s software optimizations, likely contributes to the Pixel 7a’s strong endurance rating, offsetting the slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s if you prioritize affordability and basic 5G connectivity above all else, and your usage primarily revolves around essential tasks like calling, texting, and light social media browsing. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value a premium camera experience, smooth performance for demanding apps, and access to Google's latest software features and AI capabilities, even if it means spending more.