The Wiko 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$300 5G smartphone market. Both devices leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, but diverge in areas like display brightness and charging implementation, creating a clear choice for users prioritizing specific features.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 695, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s brighter 746 nit display and slightly faster charging (despite a similar wattage) provide a more refined user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 27 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 27 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.6 x 7.9 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | - | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 115h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko 5G
- Faster initial charging (60% in 15 mins)
- Includes 5W reverse wired charging
- Competitive price point
- Display brightness data unavailable
- Camera specifications are unknown
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Brighter display (746 nits)
- Proven 115-hour endurance rating
- Supports PD3.0 and QC3 fast charging
- Slightly slower full charge time (42 mins)
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 746 nits, compared to the Wiko 5G (brightness data unavailable). This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility, making the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G the superior choice for users who frequently use their phones in sunlight. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, but the lack of specific panel technology details (like OLED vs. LCD) for the Wiko 5G leaves questions about color accuracy and viewing angles unanswered. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s brightness advantage translates to a more enjoyable multimedia experience in various lighting conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). This makes a direct camera comparison difficult. Given Xiaomi’s history of incorporating larger sensors and more sophisticated image processing algorithms in its Redmi Note series, it’s reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G will offer superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of details on the Wiko 5G’s camera system raises concerns about its overall capabilities. We can safely assume both devices will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but the quality of these features will likely differ.
Performance
Both the Wiko 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical between the two devices. The real-world performance difference will likely stem from RAM management and software optimization, areas where Xiaomi generally has a stronger track record. Neither device’s specifications detail RAM type (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5), but this is a key factor in overall system responsiveness. Thermal management will be similar, given the identical chipset and 6nm process node.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has an endurance rating of 115 hours, indicating solid battery life. While the Wiko 5G’s battery capacity is not specified, both devices offer fast charging capabilities. The Wiko 5G supports 66W wired charging, reaching 60% in 15 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging (PD3.0, QC3), achieving 50% in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. Despite the similar wattage, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s slightly slower full charge time is offset by its proven endurance rating, suggesting more efficient power management. The Wiko 5G also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko 5G if you prioritize rapid initial charging – reaching 60% in just 15 minutes is a significant advantage for users constantly on the move. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you value a brighter, more visible display in outdoor conditions and appreciate the slightly more optimized charging profile, resulting in a full charge in a reasonable 42 minutes, alongside a proven endurance rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset for casual gaming, but demanding titles like PUBG and Call of Duty will likely require reduced graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. Expect playable performance at medium settings, but don't anticipate a flagship-level gaming experience on either device.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on the Wiko 5G a major concern?
Yes, the absence of information regarding sensor size, aperture, and OIS on the Wiko 5G is a significant drawback. It suggests the camera system may not be as advanced as the one found in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, potentially resulting in lower image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
❓ How does the 66W vs 67W charging translate to real-world usage differences?
While the wattage difference is minimal, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s support for PD3.0 and QC3 charging protocols may result in slightly more efficient power delivery. However, the Wiko 5G’s faster initial charge to 60% is a practical benefit for users who need a quick power boost.
