The smartphone market is brimming with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Wiko 5G, offering modern 5G connectivity, and the Samsung Galaxy A51, a long-standing favorite known for its reliability. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to see which phone comes out on top.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Wiko 5G boasts significantly faster charging and a more modern chipset with 5G capabilities. However, the Galaxy A51 offers exceptional battery life and a proven track record. For those prioritizing speed and future-proofing, the Wiko 5G wins; for longevity and a familiar Samsung experience, the A51 remains a strong choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A515U |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 27 | 2019, December 12. Released 2019, December 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.6 x 7.9 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 158.5 x 73.6 x 7.9 mm (6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing
ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min
5W reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush White, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Pink |
| Models | - | SM-A515F, SM-A515F/DSN, SM-A515F/DS, SM-A515F/DST, SM-A515F/DSM, SM-A515F/N, SM-A515U, SM-A515U1, SM-A515W, SM-A515X, SM-S515DL |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.37 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 299.99 |
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 674.99 |
| 64GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 211.50 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 179.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.1dB / Crosstalk -87.3dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 86h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 113051 (v7), 175363 (v8)
GeekBench: 5401 (v4.4), 1294 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 5.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko 5G
- Faster Charging (66W)
- Modern Snapdragon 695 5G Chipset
- 5G Connectivity
- More Efficient Processor (6nm)
- Less Known Brand
- Battery Life Details Limited
- Camera Versatility Potentially Lower
Samsung Galaxy A51
- Exceptional Battery Life (86h Endurance)
- Reliable Samsung Brand
- Versatile Camera System
- Bright Display (636 nits)
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Older Exynos 9611 Chipset
- Less Future-Proof
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A51's display shines with a measured 636 nits of brightness and an infinite contrast ratio, providing vibrant colors and deep blacks. While the Wiko 5G's display details are less readily available, it likely offers a respectable viewing experience, though potentially not as visually striking as the A51. The A51's display is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but specifics are limited. The Galaxy A51 is known for its versatile quad-camera setup, offering a range of shooting options. The Wiko 5G likely features a competent camera, but it may not match the A51's versatility. The A51 likely wins in overall camera experience.
Performance
Here, the Wiko 5G takes a significant lead. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm) is more modern and efficient than the Galaxy A51's Exynos 9611 (10nm). This translates to smoother performance, faster app loading times, and better overall responsiveness. The Wiko 5G's CPU also shows a slight edge in clock speeds.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A51's battery life is legendary, boasting an endurance rating of 86 hours. This is a massive advantage over the Wiko 5G, where battery details are less clear. While the Wiko 5G's 66W charging is incredibly fast, it can't compensate for a potentially smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
The Wiko 5G is ideal for users who want 5G connectivity, fast charging, and a more recent processor. It's a good option for those on a budget who want to experience the latest technology. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is perfect for users who value long battery life, a reliable brand, and a well-rounded experience. It's a great choice for those who prioritize endurance over cutting-edge features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Wiko 5G worth buying if I don't need 5G?
If you don't need 5G, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is likely a better choice due to its superior battery life and established reputation.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Wiko 5G's more modern chipset should provide better gaming performance, especially for demanding titles.
