The Wiko 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded budget 5G smartphone market. Both aim to deliver 5G connectivity without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with different approaches to chipset selection and feature prioritization. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Wiko 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695 paired with 66W charging provides a noticeable performance and convenience advantage over the Moto G 5G’s Snapdragon 750G and slower 20W charging, despite the Moto G 5G's slightly better endurance rating.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 27 | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.6 x 7.9 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min
5W reverse wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1419:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 312461 (v8)
GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko 5G
- Significantly faster 66W charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 (6nm)
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Newer CPU architecture (Kryo 660)
- Display peak brightness not specified, likely lower than Moto G 5G
- Camera specifications are unknown
Motorola Moto G 5G
- Higher peak display brightness (484 nits)
- Stronger battery endurance rating (131h)
- Potentially slightly better sustained CPU performance
- Established brand reputation
- Slow 20W charging
- Less efficient Snapdragon 750G (8nm)
- Older CPU architecture (Kryo 570)
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1419:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 484 nits, a figure the Wiko 5G’s display specifications do not match. This suggests the Moto G 5G will offer better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the price point), the Moto G 5G’s higher brightness provides a tangible advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack detailed camera specifications. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the budget nature of both devices, it’s reasonable to assume similar image quality. Focusing on the chipset’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) capabilities, the Snapdragon 695 in the Wiko 5G benefits from Qualcomm’s latest image processing algorithms, potentially leading to slightly better low-light performance and dynamic range. The absence of details suggests neither phone will excel in challenging photographic conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Wiko 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Moto G 5G features the Snapdragon 750G 5G (8nm). While the 750G has a slightly higher clock speed on its prime core (2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz), the 6nm process node of the 695 offers improved power efficiency. This translates to potentially better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The Kryo 660 cores in the Wiko 5G are a generation newer than the Kryo 570 cores in the Moto G 5G, suggesting architectural improvements. The Wiko 5G’s CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz + 6x1.7 GHz) is optimized for a balance of performance and efficiency, while the Moto G 5G’s (2x2.2 GHz + 6x1.8 GHz) prioritizes slightly higher sustained performance at the cost of efficiency.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G 5G claims an endurance rating of 131 hours, a solid figure for a smartphone. However, the Wiko 5G compensates with significantly faster charging. Its 66W wired charging can reach 60% in just 15 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes, a substantial advantage over the Moto G 5G’s 20W charging. The Wiko 5G also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Moto G 5G, allowing it to top up accessories. While the Moto G 5G may last longer on a single charge, the Wiko 5G’s rapid charging minimizes downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko 5G if you prioritize fast charging and responsive everyday performance. The 66W charging is a game-changer for minimizing downtime. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G if maximizing battery endurance is your absolute top priority, and you're willing to trade off charging speed and potentially some performance responsiveness for that extra longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the Wiko 5G's charging compared to the Moto G 5G in real-world use?
The Wiko 5G's 66W charging can add a significant charge in a short time. Reaching 60% in 15 minutes means you can get hours of use from a quick top-up, whereas the Moto G 5G's 20W charging will take considerably longer to achieve the same level of charge. This is particularly beneficial for users who frequently find themselves needing to quickly replenish their battery.
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Wiko 5G struggle with demanding games compared to the Snapdragon 750G in the Moto G 5G?
While the Snapdragon 750G has a slightly higher clock speed, the Snapdragon 695's newer architecture and 6nm process node offer improved efficiency. For most mobile games, the Wiko 5G should provide a smooth experience, though the Moto G 5G might maintain slightly higher frame rates in graphically intensive titles over extended periods. The difference is unlikely to be significant for casual gamers.
❓ Does the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones mean the camera quality is equally poor?
Not necessarily, but it does suggest neither phone will be a standout performer in photography. Both likely feature similar sensor and lens configurations typical of budget smartphones. The Wiko 5G may have a slight edge due to Qualcomm's image processing advancements, but don't expect flagship-level image quality from either device.
