Wiko 5G vs. Google Pixel 6a: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, intelligent experience and long-term software support, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice. While the Wiko 5G boasts impressively fast 66W charging, the Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor chip delivers significantly better performance and camera capabilities, justifying its slightly higher price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Wiko 5G | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 27 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 27 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.6 x 7.9 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 22mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min 5W reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | - | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Wiko 5G
- Extremely fast 66W charging
- Competitive 5G connectivity
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful processor than the Pixel 6a
- Software support likely limited compared to Pixel
- Camera performance likely inferior to Pixel 6a
Google Pixel 6a
- Powerful Google Tensor chip
- Exceptional camera performance with Google’s software
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Slower 18W charging
- Higher price compared to the Wiko 5G
- No expandable storage
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6a’s display shines with a measured peak brightness of 876 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight – a metric the Wiko 5G’s specifications don’t disclose. While both phones likely utilize OLED panels given the 'infinite' contrast ratio of the Pixel 6a, the Pixel’s brightness advantage is significant. The absence of a high refresh rate on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency, but the Pixel’s superior brightness makes it the better choice for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera prowess is largely attributed to Google’s image processing algorithms, working in tandem with its sensor. While sensor size and aperture details are missing for the Wiko 5G, the Pixel 6a’s computational photography capabilities – including features like Magic Eraser – provide a significant advantage. The Pixel’s focus on software optimization allows it to capture consistently high-quality images, even in challenging lighting conditions. The Wiko 5G likely relies more heavily on hardware, and without detailed specs, it’s difficult to assess its camera performance relative to the Pixel 6a’s proven track record.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) is architecturally more advanced than the Wiko 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). Tensor’s octa-core configuration, featuring 2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 cores, provides a substantial performance uplift compared to the Snapdragon 695’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience on the Pixel 6a. The 5nm process node of the Tensor chip also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Snapdragon 695 is capable, it’s geared towards efficient 5G connectivity rather than raw processing power.
Battery Life
Both the Wiko 5G and Pixel 6a achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life despite potentially different battery capacities. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Wiko 5G’s 66W wired charging can replenish the battery to 60% in just 15 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes, a significant advantage over the Pixel 6a’s 18W wired charging with PD3.0. This makes the Wiko 5G ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Pixel 6a’s slower charging speed necessitates a longer charging time, but its efficient Tensor chip and software optimization contribute to its comparable endurance rating.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko 5G if you need blazing-fast charging and prioritize 5G connectivity above all else, and are comfortable with a less polished software experience. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you prefer a consistently smooth user experience, exceptional camera performance powered by Google’s computational photography, and guaranteed software updates for years to come.