The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Wiko 10 aims for a balance of affordability and usability, while the Xiaomi Poco M5 prioritizes performance with a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco M5 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, built on a 6nm process, provides a significant performance advantage over the Wiko 10’s Helio G37, making it better suited for gaming and demanding applications. While charging is slightly slower, the overall experience is more responsive.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 22 | 2022, September 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 10 | Available. Released 2022, September 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 77.6 x 9 mm (6.63 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Klein Blue, Black, Silver | Black, Green, Yellow |
| Models | - | 22071219CG |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.04 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1363:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 386311 (v9)
GeekBench: 1896 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko 10
- Faster wired charging (22.5W)
- Potentially simpler software experience
- Lower price point (likely)
- Significantly weaker processor (Helio G37)
- Less efficient chipset (12nm)
- Likely lower performance in demanding apps
Xiaomi Poco M5
- More powerful processor (Helio G99)
- More efficient chipset (6nm)
- Better CPU architecture (Cortex-A76 cores)
- Higher display brightness
- Slower wired charging (18W)
- Potentially more aggressive software (Xiaomi MIUI)
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both the Wiko 10 and Poco M5 feature displays with a 1363:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the Poco M5 boasts a measured peak brightness of 448 nits, which is crucial for outdoor visibility – a clear advantage over the Wiko 10, where brightness data is unavailable. While neither display is expected to be flagship-level, the Poco M5’s higher brightness makes it more usable in bright conditions. We expect both to use IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are absent. Given the price point, we can anticipate similar limitations – likely a primary sensor paired with basic auxiliary lenses. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Xiaomi’s image processing algorithms are generally more refined than Wiko’s, suggesting the Poco M5 may produce more pleasing images, even with similar hardware. The absence of OIS on either device means low-light performance will likely be a challenge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco M5’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Wiko 10’s Helio G37 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning the Poco M5 is less likely to throttle under sustained load. Furthermore, the CPU architecture is markedly different: the Poco M5 utilizes 2x Cortex-A76 cores alongside 6x Cortex-A55 cores, while the Wiko 10 relies on 4x Cortex-A53 and 4x Cortex-A53. The A76 cores in the Poco M5 provide a significant boost in single-core performance, impacting app launch speeds and overall responsiveness. The Wiko 10 will likely struggle with more demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both phones share an endurance rating of 121 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite the Poco M5’s more powerful processor. This is likely due to the G99’s 6nm efficiency offsetting its higher performance. However, the Wiko 10 supports 22.5W wired charging, while the Poco M5 is limited to 18W. This translates to a faster 0-100% charge time for the Wiko 10, though the difference may not be substantial. The similar endurance ratings mean the efficiency gains of the G99 are effectively utilized.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko 10 if you prioritize a simple, straightforward user experience and aren't heavily reliant on demanding apps or mobile gaming. It's a solid option for basic communication and light social media use. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M5 if you want a phone that can handle more intensive tasks, including gaming, and appreciate a more powerful processor for future-proofing, even if it means slightly slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco M5’s Helio G99 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Helio G99 is specifically designed for gaming. While it won’t deliver flagship-level performance, it should comfortably run PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process also helps mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the 22.5W charging on the Wiko 10 a significant advantage over the Poco M5’s 18W?
While 22.5W is faster on paper, the difference in real-world charging times is likely to be moderate. Expect the Wiko 10 to charge slightly quicker, but the Poco M5’s battery efficiency may offset this advantage in daily use. The convenience of faster charging is there, but it’s not a game-changer.
❓ How does Xiaomi’s MIUI software compare to the software experience on the Wiko 10?
Xiaomi’s MIUI is a heavily customized Android skin known for its features and sometimes, pre-installed bloatware. The Wiko 10 likely runs a closer-to-stock Android experience, which some users prefer for its simplicity and cleaner interface. MIUI can be more resource-intensive, potentially impacting performance on the Poco M5, but also offers more customization options.
