The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Wiko 10 and the Micromax In Note 1. Both promise a lot, but which one delivers the best overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Micromax In Note 1 edges out the Wiko 10 thanks to its superior Helio G85 chipset, offering noticeably better performance for gaming and multitasking. While the Wiko 10 has faster charging, the In Note 1’s reverse charging and stronger processor make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 22 | 2020, November 03. Released 2020, November 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 10 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 77.6 x 9 mm (6.63 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 165.2 x 77 x 9 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Klein Blue, Black, Silver | Green, White |
| Models | - | E7746 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
Wiko 10
- Faster Charging (22.5W)
- Simple and User-Friendly Interface
- Potentially more affordable
- Weaker Processor
- Lower Performance
- Likely lower battery capacity
Micromax In note 1
- More Powerful Processor (Helio G85)
- Better Performance for Gaming & Multitasking
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Likely Larger Battery
- Slower Charging (18W)
- Potentially slightly higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD displays, probably around 6.5 inches with a resolution of 1600 x 720 pixels (HD+). Expect decent viewing angles and color reproduction, but don't anticipate flagship-level vibrancy. The Micromax In Note 1 might have a slightly higher refresh rate (90Hz vs 60Hz on the Wiko 10, assuming typical specs for these models), leading to smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are often similar in this price range. Both phones likely feature a primary 13MP camera, along with ultrawide and macro lenses. Image quality will be decent in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The Micromax In Note 1 might have slightly better image processing due to its more powerful processor.
Performance
This is where the Micromax In Note 1 shines. The Helio G85 is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Helio G37. Expect smoother app launches, better multitasking capabilities, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the In Note 1. The Wiko 10 will handle basic tasks adequately, but will struggle with demanding games or heavy applications.
Battery Life
The Wiko 10 boasts 22.5W fast charging, which is a definite advantage. However, the Micromax In Note 1 likely has a larger battery capacity (around 5000mAh, typical for this class) and also offers reverse wired charging, allowing you to charge other devices from your phone.
Buying Guide
The Wiko 10 is a good option for users prioritizing fast charging and a simple, straightforward experience. The Micromax In Note 1 is ideal for those seeking better performance for gaming, multitasking, and those who appreciate the added convenience of reverse charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Wiko 10 good for gaming?
The Wiko 10 can handle basic games, but it will struggle with more demanding titles due to its weaker processor. The Micromax In Note 1 is a better choice for gamers.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Micromax In Note 1 likely has better battery life due to its potentially larger battery capacity, although the Wiko 10 charges faster.
