vivo Z5x vs OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren: A Detailed Performance and Value Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855+ chipset offers significantly faster processing speeds and superior gaming capabilities. While the vivo Z5x provides 5G at a lower cost, the performance trade-offs are substantial.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Z5x | OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 71 SA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, May. Released 2019, June | 2019, October 23. Released 2019, November 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.3 x 8.9 mm (6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204.1 g (7.20 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~516 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, AF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4085 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Dark Gray, Blue | Papaya Orange |
| Models | V1911A, V1919A, 1919 | HD1925 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 800 EUR |
vivo Z5x
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful chipset
- Significantly slower performance
- Less capable camera system
- Slower charging speeds
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 855+
- Faster 30W Warp Charge technology
- Likely superior camera quality
- Higher price
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, being a flagship, likely features a higher-quality AMOLED panel with a higher refresh rate (90Hz was standard for the 7T Pro series) and potentially higher peak brightness compared to the vivo Z5x. The McLaren edition also likely benefits from improved color calibration. The Z5x, targeting a lower price point, likely utilizes a standard AMOLED or LCD panel with more modest specifications. Bezels are also likely slimmer on the OnePlus device, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a precise comparison. However, given the price difference, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor, optical image stabilization (OIS), and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Z5x likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for a less capable sensor. The McLaren edition likely benefits from OnePlus's tuning for color accuracy and dynamic range. The presence of OIS on the OnePlus device would be a significant advantage in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) is a significant leap over the vivo Z5x’s Snapdragon 710 (10nm). The 855+ features a Kryo 485 core clocked at 2.96 GHz, compared to the 710’s Kryo 360 Gold core at 2.2 GHz. This translates to approximately 25-30% faster CPU performance in benchmarks and real-world applications. The 7nm process node of the 855+ also provides better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The GPU in the 855+ is also substantially more powerful, making it ideal for demanding games. The Z5x will handle everyday tasks adequately, but will struggle with graphically intensive games and multitasking.
Battery Life
The vivo Z5x features 18W wired charging, while the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren boasts 30W Warp Charge technology. This means the OnePlus device can charge significantly faster – likely reaching 50% charge in around 30 minutes, compared to potentially over an hour for the Z5x. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the OnePlus device mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The 7nm process of the 855+ also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting the higher power draw of the more powerful chipset.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Z5x if you need a budget-friendly 5G phone and are willing to compromise on processing power for everyday tasks like browsing and social media. Buy the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren if you prioritize a smooth, responsive experience, demanding mobile gaming, and faster application loading times, and are willing to pay a premium for flagship-level performance.