The vivo Z3x and Oppo F11 represent a fascinating intersection of mid-range smartphone technology from 2019. Both devices aimed to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they took different approaches under the hood. The Z3x leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 660, while the F11 opts for MediaTek’s Helio P70. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which phone offers the best value for today’s user.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a potentially smoother experience, the vivo Z3x with its Snapdragon 660 is the better choice. While the Oppo F11 boasts 20W fast charging, the Snapdragon 660’s architecture provides a more efficient foundation for everyday tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - V1 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, April. Released 2019, May | 2019, March. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 154.8 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.09 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 162 x 76.1 x 8.3 mm (6.38 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 150 g (5.29 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 512 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3260 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4020 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Red, Aurora | Flourite Purple, Marble Green, Jewelry White |
| Models | V1730GA | CPH1913, CPH1911 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo Z3x
- More efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Superior GPU for gaming
- Likely slower charging speeds
- May have a less refined camera software experience
Oppo F11
- 20W fast charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially better camera software features
- Slightly newer chipset architecture
- Helio P70 may throttle under sustained load
- Less efficient chipset compared to Snapdragon 660
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given their market positioning, both likely featured LCD panels with 1080p+ resolutions. The Oppo F11, being a slightly more premium offering, *may* have had a marginally better panel in terms of color accuracy or peak brightness, but this is speculative. Bezels were likely comparable, typical of phones in this price bracket at the time.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a precise comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely featured a primary camera around 16-20MP. The Oppo F11, given its branding, might have focused more on software-driven image enhancements and potentially included a more sophisticated night mode. The Snapdragon 660’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally considered more capable than the Helio P70’s, potentially leading to better dynamic range and detail in photos. The prevalence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both devices suggests these were largely marketing features with limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Z3x’s Snapdragon 660 (14nm) utilizes a Kryo CPU architecture – 4x2.2 GHz Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Silver – designed for a balance of performance and efficiency. The Oppo F11’s Helio P70 (12nm) employs a more traditional Cortex-A73/A53 configuration with clocks of 2.1 GHz and 2.0 GHz respectively. While the P70’s smaller 12nm process *should* theoretically offer better power efficiency, the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo cores and optimized software integration often resulted in superior real-world performance, particularly in sustained workloads. The Snapdragon 660’s Adreno 512 GPU also generally outperformed the Helio P70’s Arm Mali-G72 MP3, making the Z3x the better choice for gaming.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device. However, the Oppo F11’s 20W wired charging is a significant advantage. The Snapdragon 660 is known for its relatively efficient power consumption, but the F11’s faster charging could offset a potentially smaller battery capacity for users who prioritize quick top-ups. A full charge on the F11 would likely be significantly faster than on the Z3x, assuming similar battery sizes.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Z3x if you need a phone that handles multitasking and moderate gaming with relative ease, and you value a chipset known for its stability. Buy the Oppo F11 if you prioritize faster charging speeds and are willing to potentially trade off some sustained performance for quicker top-ups, especially if you frequently find yourself needing to recharge throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P70 in the Oppo F11 struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Helio P70 can run PUBG Mobile, you may experience more frequent frame drops and throttling during extended gaming sessions compared to the Snapdragon 660 in the vivo Z3x. The Snapdragon 660’s more efficient architecture and superior GPU provide a smoother, more consistent gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 20W charging on the Oppo F11 compared to a standard charger?
The 20W charging on the Oppo F11 is significantly faster than standard 10W or 15W charging. Expect a 0-50% charge in around 30-40 minutes, and a full charge in approximately 1 hour 15 minutes, assuming a compatible charger is used. The vivo Z3x, lacking this fast charging capability, would take considerably longer to reach a full charge.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks, the difference between the Snapdragon 660 and Helio P70 is less pronounced. However, the Snapdragon 660’s superior multi-core performance and optimized software integration will result in slightly snappier app launches and smoother multitasking, even during everyday use.
