The vivo Z1x and Motorola One Vision Plus represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this. The Z1x prioritizes processing power with its Snapdragon 712, while the One Vision Plus focuses on a more efficient chipset with the Snapdragon 665. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and faster charging, the vivo Z1x is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 712 offers a noticeable step up in processing power compared to the Motorola One Vision Plus’s Snapdragon 665, and the 22.5W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the One Vision Plus remains a viable option for those seeking a more power-efficient device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2020, July 10. Released 2020, July 13 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189.6 g (6.70 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, Funtouch 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired
5W reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fusion Blue, Phantom Purple | Cosmic Blue, Crystal Pink |
| Models | 1917, PD1921F_EX | - |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 0.55 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Z1x
- Faster Snapdragon 712 processor for improved performance
- 22.5W fast charging for quicker top-ups
- 5W reverse wired charging for convenience
- Potentially higher power consumption due to the more powerful chipset
- No information on display quality
Motorola One Vision Plus
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Clean Motorola software experience
- Slower Snapdragon 665 processor for less demanding tasks
- Slower 15W charging
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, it's reasonable to assume both utilize LCD panels. The Motorola One Vision Plus, being a slightly later release, *may* benefit from improved color calibration. The absence of high refresh rate support on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency rather than visual fluidity. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference hints at processing advantages for the Z1x. The Snapdragon 712’s image signal processor (ISP) is more capable than the 665’s, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction in photos and videos. The absence of information regarding sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes it impossible to definitively declare a winner, but the Z1x’s superior processing power gives it an edge. It's likely both phones rely on software processing to enhance image quality.
Performance
The vivo Z1x’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 (10nm) represents a significant advantage over the Motorola One Vision Plus’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 712’s Kryo 360 Gold cores, clocked at 2.3 GHz, deliver substantially more processing power than the 665’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. While the 665’s 11nm process is theoretically more efficient, the architectural improvements in the 712, coupled with its higher clock speeds, likely offset this advantage in most real-world scenarios. Gamers will find the Z1x capable of handling more demanding titles at higher settings.
Battery Life
The battery capacity for both devices is not provided. However, the charging capabilities are a clear differentiator. The vivo Z1x’s 22.5W wired charging is significantly faster than the Motorola One Vision Plus’s 15W wired charging. This means the Z1x can replenish its battery much more quickly, reducing downtime. The Z1x also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Motorola, allowing it to top up other devices. Even with a similar battery capacity, the Z1x’s faster charging provides a tangible benefit for users who are frequently on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Z1x if you need a phone capable of handling demanding apps, moderate gaming, and appreciate significantly faster charging speeds. This phone is ideal for users who frequently multitask or consume media. Buy the Motorola One Vision Plus if you prioritize battery life and a more streamlined, efficient experience. It’s a better fit for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media browsing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 665 in the Motorola One Vision Plus struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 665 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Z1x’s Snapdragon 712 offers a more comfortable gaming experience with higher settings and more consistent performance.
❓ How much faster is the 22.5W charging on the vivo Z1x compared to the 15W charging on the Motorola One Vision Plus?
The 22.5W charging on the Z1x will significantly reduce charging times. While exact 0-100% times depend on battery capacity, expect the Z1x to charge considerably faster – potentially shaving off 30-60 minutes compared to the One Vision Plus.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 712 in the vivo Z1x generate more heat during prolonged use compared to the Snapdragon 665?
The Snapdragon 712 will likely generate more heat under sustained load due to its higher performance. However, the Z1x’s thermal management system should mitigate this, preventing significant throttling. The 665 will remain cooler, but at the cost of performance.
