The vivo Z1Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro represent a pivotal moment in the mid-range smartphone market, offering impressive specs at competitive prices. Both devices aimed to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, but they took different approaches, primarily centered around their respective Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets. This comparison dissects the nuances of the Snapdragon 712 in the Z1Pro versus the Snapdragon 675 in the Note 7 Pro, revealing which phone delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly more refined chipset, the vivo Z1Pro emerges as the winner. The Snapdragon 712, built on a smaller 10nm process, offers a modest performance edge and potentially better thermal management compared to the Redmi Note 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 675. However, the Redmi Note 7 Pro’s Quick Charge 4 support provides a slight convenience advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2019, February 28. Released 2019, March 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.3 x 8.9 mm (6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) | 159.2 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, Funtouch 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, AF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 13 MP, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, QC4 |
| Type | 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sonic Blue, Sonic Black, Mirror Black | Nebula Red, Neptune Blue, Space Black, Astro White |
| Models | 1951, PD1911F_EX, 1918 | M1901F7S |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | 0.75 W/kg (head) 0.40 W/kg (body) | 0.96 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 184517 (v7)
GeekBench: 6001 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 180754 (v7), 215308 (v8)
GeekBench: 6620 (v4.4), 1624 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Z1Pro
- Snapdragon 712 offers a performance edge.
- 10nm process potentially leads to better thermal management.
- More advanced ISP for potentially better image processing.
- Lacks Quick Charge 4 compatibility.
- May be slightly more expensive.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro
- Quick Charge 4 support for wider charger compatibility.
- Potentially lower price point.
- Capable Snapdragon 675 for everyday tasks.
- Snapdragon 675 is less powerful than the 712.
- 11nm process may lead to more heat under load.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, common for this price bracket in 2019. The focus here isn't on panel technology, but rather the internal hardware driving the experience. Without specific display specs, we can infer that the chipset's GPU will be the primary determinant of smooth scrolling and responsiveness, giving a slight edge to the Z1Pro's Snapdragon 712.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. Both phones likely feature similar sensor configurations targeting the mid-range market. The Snapdragon 712’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more advanced than the 675’s, potentially resulting in slightly better image processing, dynamic range, and low-light performance. However, software optimization plays a crucial role, and Xiaomi’s camera algorithms are often highly regarded. The real-world difference will likely be subtle.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Z1Pro’s Snapdragon 712 (10nm) features Kryo 360 Gold and Silver cores clocked up to 2.3 GHz. The Redmi Note 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 675 (11nm) uses Kryo 460 cores, peaking at 2.0 GHz. While the 675 has a slightly newer architecture, the 712’s higher clock speeds and smaller manufacturing process generally translate to better single-core and multi-core performance. The 11nm process of the 675, while efficient, is less so than the 10nm process of the 712, potentially leading to more heat generation under sustained load. This impacts gaming and prolonged multitasking, where the Z1Pro is likely to maintain higher frame rates for longer.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 18W wired charging, but the Redmi Note 7 Pro adds Quick Charge 4 (QC4) compatibility. While both achieve similar charging speeds, QC4 offers broader compatibility with various chargers. Without knowing the battery capacities, it’s hard to declare a clear winner. However, the Snapdragon 712’s potentially better power efficiency could translate to slightly longer battery life in real-world usage, offsetting any capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Z1Pro if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications and moderate gaming sessions with a bit more headroom. Its Snapdragon 712 offers a slight performance advantage. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro if you prioritize quick charging compatibility and are looking for a solid all-around performer at a potentially lower price point. The Snapdragon 675 remains a capable chipset for everyday tasks and casual gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 675 in the Redmi Note 7 Pro struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG?
The Snapdragon 675 is capable of running PUBG, but you may need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The Z1Pro’s Snapdragon 712 will offer a more stable experience at higher settings due to its superior processing power and potentially better thermal management.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 712 in the vivo Z1Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 712 can generate heat under sustained load, its 10nm process is more efficient than the 675’s 11nm process. This suggests the Z1Pro is less prone to significant thermal throttling during extended gaming, allowing for more consistent performance.
❓ Is Quick Charge 4 on the Redmi Note 7 Pro a significant advantage over the Z1Pro’s 18W charging?
Quick Charge 4 offers broader compatibility with a wider range of chargers, meaning you’re more likely to be able to utilize fast charging with an existing charger. While both phones support 18W charging, QC4 provides added convenience and flexibility.
