The vivo Z1Pro and Oppo K3 represent a fascinating intersection in the mid-range smartphone market. Both devices leverage Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 7-series, but with subtle differences in chipset and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects those differences, revealing which phone delivers the best value for performance-conscious users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Z1Pro edges out the Oppo K3 due to its slightly more powerful Snapdragon 712 chipset. While the K3’s 20W charging is a benefit, the performance uplift of the Z1Pro translates to a smoother overall experience, especially in demanding applications.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2019, May. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.3 x 8.9 mm (6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) | 161.2 x 76 x 9.4 mm (6.35 x 2.99 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 616 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, Funtouch 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, 1/2.5", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, AF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3765 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sonic Blue, Sonic Black, Mirror Black | Black, Nebula Purple, Morning White |
| Models | 1951, PD1911F_EX, 1918 | CPH1955, PCGM00 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 210 EUR |
| SAR | 0.75 W/kg (head) 0.40 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 184517 (v7)
GeekBench: 6001 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo Z1Pro
- Slightly more powerful Snapdragon 712 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- May offer slightly better image processing
- Slower 18W charging
- Potentially less refined software experience (depending on vivo’s FunTouch OS)
Oppo K3
- Faster 20W wired charging
- Potentially more streamlined software experience (depending on Oppo’s ColorOS)
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 710 chipset
- May exhibit more throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. Without specific brightness or color gamut data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner. However, the focus here is on internal specs, and display differences are likely minimal. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of phones released around the same time.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups geared towards versatility. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 712 *may* offer slightly better image processing capabilities, resulting in improved dynamic range and noise reduction. However, software tuning plays a significant role, and this difference may be negligible in real-world use. We can assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo Z1Pro features the Snapdragon 712, while the Oppo K3 uses the Snapdragon 710. Both are 10nm processors with an octa-core configuration (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver for the Z1Pro, and 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver for the K3). The 712’s slightly higher clock speed on the prime cores provides a modest performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. While the GPU is the same (Adreno 616), the 712’s overall system-level optimizations contribute to a smoother experience. The Z1Pro is likely to exhibit less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oppo K3’s 20W wired charging is a clear advantage over the vivo Z1Pro’s 18W charging. This translates to faster top-up times, potentially shaving off 15-20 minutes for a full charge. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the K3 is a tangible benefit for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery. The Z1Pro’s 712 chipset, being slightly more efficient, *could* offset some of this difference in overall battery life, but the K3’s charging speed is the more impactful feature.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Z1Pro if you prioritize sustained performance for gaming or multitasking and want the most processing power for your money. Buy the Oppo K3 if you value faster charging speeds and a potentially more refined software experience, accepting a minor performance trade-off. Both phones cater to budget-conscious users, but their strengths differ.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will I notice a significant difference in gaming performance between the Snapdragon 712 and 710?
While not a massive leap, the Snapdragon 712 in the vivo Z1Pro will provide a smoother gaming experience, particularly in demanding titles. The higher clock speeds and optimizations will result in fewer frame drops and more consistent performance over extended gaming sessions. Expect a slight, but noticeable, advantage.
❓ How much faster is the Oppo K3's 20W charging compared to the vivo Z1Pro's 18W charging in real-world use?
The Oppo K3's 20W charging can realistically shave off 15-20 minutes from a full 0-100% charge compared to the vivo Z1Pro. This difference is most noticeable when topping up the battery quickly, making the K3 ideal for users who are often on the go.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 712 in the vivo Z1Pro handle multitasking better than the Snapdragon 710 in the Oppo K3?
Yes, the Snapdragon 712 is better equipped for multitasking. Its slightly more powerful CPU and optimized architecture allow it to handle more apps running in the background without significant performance slowdowns. This translates to a smoother experience when switching between applications.
