The vivo Z1Pro and Motorola One Vision Plus represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this. The Z1Pro leverages the more powerful Snapdragon 712, while the One Vision Plus opts for the more efficient Snapdragon 665. This comparison dives deep into the implications of these chipset choices and how they affect real-world performance, battery life, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and responsiveness, the vivo Z1Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 712 chipset provides a noticeable edge in multitasking and gaming. However, the Motorola One Vision Plus offers a respectable experience for everyday tasks and benefits from a potentially more optimized software experience, making it a viable alternative for less demanding users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2020, July 10. Released 2020, July 13 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 77.3 x 8.9 mm (6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, Funtouch 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, AF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sonic Blue, Sonic Black, Mirror Black | Cosmic Blue, Crystal Pink |
| Models | 1951, PD1911F_EX, 1918 | - |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | 0.75 W/kg (head) 0.40 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 184517 (v7)
GeekBench: 6001 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo Z1Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 712 chipset
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Potentially less battery efficiency
- May run a more heavily customized UI
Motorola One Vision Plus
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Likely cleaner software experience
- Potentially better battery life for light usage
- Slower Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Potentially less capable camera processing
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, we can infer both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The Motorola One Vision Plus, being a 'Vision' series device, may have a slightly more color-accurate display, leaning towards a more natural look. The Z1Pro, geared towards a younger audience, might prioritize vibrant colors. Without specific data on peak brightness or resolution, it's difficult to declare a clear winner.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor details, a precise camera comparison is impossible. However, the chipset difference hints at processing capabilities. The Snapdragon 712 in the Z1Pro has a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) than the 665 in the One Vision Plus. This means the Z1Pro can likely handle more complex image processing tasks, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Motorola One Vision Plus may rely more on software algorithms to compensate, potentially leading to less natural-looking images. The absence of information on OIS or aperture sizes further complicates the analysis.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Z1Pro’s Snapdragon 712 (10nm) boasts a Kryo 360 Gold/Silver configuration clocked up to 2.3 GHz, offering a significant performance advantage over the Motorola One Vision Plus’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm) with its Kryo 260 Gold/Silver cores peaking at 2.0 GHz. The 10nm process of the SDM712, while older, allows for higher sustained performance before thermal throttling compared to the 11nm SDM665. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user interface on the Z1Pro. The SD665 focuses on efficiency, potentially offering longer battery life during less intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Motorola One Vision Plus’s 15W charging is slower than the vivo Z1Pro’s 18W charging. While the SDM665 is more power-efficient, the difference in charging speed is noticeable. The Z1Pro will likely reach a higher charge percentage in the same amount of time. Without knowing the battery capacity of each device, it’s difficult to determine which offers better overall battery life. However, the Z1Pro’s faster charging mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Z1Pro if you frequently engage in mobile gaming, run demanding applications, or require a phone that can handle heavy multitasking without slowdowns. The Snapdragon 712 provides a tangible performance boost. Buy the Motorola One Vision Plus if you prioritize battery efficiency for all-day use, prefer a cleaner software experience with fewer pre-installed apps, and primarily use your phone for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and communication. It's a solid choice for those seeking a reliable daily driver.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 665 in the Motorola One Vision Plus struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Snapdragon 665 can run PUBG Mobile, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The Z1Pro's Snapdragon 712 offers a significantly better gaming experience, allowing for higher settings and more stable performance.
❓ How much faster is the 18W charging on the vivo Z1Pro compared to the 15W charging on the Motorola One Vision Plus?
The 18W charging on the Z1Pro will noticeably reduce charging times. Expect a roughly 20-30% faster charge from 0-100%, meaning you'll spend less time tethered to an outlet. While not a revolutionary difference, it adds up over time.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 712 in the vivo Z1Pro generate significantly more heat during prolonged use?
The Snapdragon 712 *can* generate more heat under sustained load than the Snapdragon 665. However, the Z1Pro's thermal management system should mitigate this. Expect some warming during gaming, but likely not to the point of significant throttling.
