The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y9s and Honor 200 Smart represent compelling options for users prioritizing affordability. However, beneath the similar price points lie significant differences in their core components, particularly their chipsets. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on how they impact performance, efficiency, and the overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Honor 200 Smart is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) offers a noticeable performance uplift and improved power efficiency compared to the vivo Y9s’ Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The faster 35W charging further sweetens the deal, making it a more future-proof and responsive device.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2024, September 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2024, September 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 75.2 x 8.7 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.1 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.7 g (6.60 oz) | 191 g or 193 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~389 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.3 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | TFT LCD, 120Hz, 850 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 613 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 14, Magic OS 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 35W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fancy Sky, Knight Black, Nebula Blue | Midnight Black, Forest Green |
| Models | V1945A, V1945T | ALT-NX1 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 109.99 / £ 114.99 |
vivo Y9s
- Familiar Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset
- Potentially lower price point
- Established brand recognition
- Older, less efficient Snapdragon 665
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely inferior image processing
Honor 200 Smart
- More efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm)
- Faster 35W wired charging
- Improved image processing capabilities
- May be slightly more expensive
- Less established brand in some markets
- Potential for software bloat (Honor's history)
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the price bracket, both likely utilize LCD panels with 60Hz refresh rates. The Honor 200 Smart, being a newer device, *may* benefit from slightly improved color calibration and viewing angles. However, without specific nit brightness or color gamut data, a definitive comparison is impossible. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on minimizing cost rather than achieving ultra-thin designs.
Camera Comparison
Without camera sensor details, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset plays a crucial role in image processing. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced, enabling better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. It's reasonable to assume the Honor 200 Smart will deliver superior camera performance, even with similarly priced sensors. The Y9s will likely rely on software processing to compensate for its older chipset's limitations.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor 200 Smart’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant leap forward. The move to a 4nm process node dramatically improves power efficiency, reducing heat and allowing for sustained performance. While the Snapdragon 665 in the vivo Y9s is an octa-core processor, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 features a more modern CPU architecture – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores alongside 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – offering better single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the Honor 200 Smart. The Y9s' Kryo 260 cores, while capable, are older and less efficient.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Honor 200 Smart’s 35W wired charging is a clear advantage. This allows for significantly faster charging times compared to the vivo Y9s’ 18W charging. Even with a similar battery capacity, the 200 Smart will spend less time tethered to a charger. Furthermore, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s 4nm process contributes to better power efficiency, potentially extending battery life during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y9s if you prioritize a familiar Qualcomm chipset and are on an extremely tight budget, accepting compromises in performance and charging speed. Buy the Honor 200 Smart if you value a more modern, efficient processor, faster charging, and a smoother overall experience, even if it means stepping slightly outside the absolute lowest price bracket.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Honor 200 Smart handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While not a flagship chipset, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The 4nm process helps prevent excessive throttling during extended gaming sessions, offering a more consistent experience than the Snapdragon 665 in the vivo Y9s.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 18W and 35W really that noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is substantial. 35W charging can add a significant percentage of battery life in just a short amount of time – potentially 50% in 30 minutes – while 18W charging will take considerably longer. This is particularly beneficial for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 665 in the vivo Y9s still offer a usable experience for social media and basic tasks?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 665 is still perfectly adequate for everyday tasks like browsing the web, checking email, and using social media apps. However, you may notice slower app loading times and occasional stutters compared to the Honor 200 Smart.
