Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ vs. vivo Y78: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Snapdragon 695 in the vivo Y78, and the blazing-fast 120W charging is a game-changer. While the Y78 offers respectable battery life, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s speed and overall capabilities justify the slight price premium.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y78 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 29 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 10 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 208.4 g (7.34 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Flare Black, Dreamy Gold | Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition |
| Models | - | 22101316UCP, 22101316UG |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 348.00 / £ 439.00 / € 399.00 / ₹ 29,949 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 498710 (v9) GeekBench: 2208 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y78
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- Significantly faster 120W charging
- Likely superior camera system (based on market positioning)
- Potentially higher price point
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- More affordable price
- Respectable battery life
- Stable and reliable performance for basic tasks
- Slower processor limits gaming and multitasking
- Significantly slower charging speed
Display Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed display specifications for either device. However, given the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s positioning, it likely features a higher resolution and potentially a higher refresh rate panel than the Y78. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio advertised for the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is a marketing term, but suggests a good quality AMOLED panel. Without specific nit brightness figures, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ likely offers a more visually immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
The context data is limited regarding camera specifics. However, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is known for its 200MP main sensor (not mentioned in the provided data, but a key feature), which offers substantial detail and potential for cropping. The Y78’s camera specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. Assuming a standard mid-range sensor, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ will likely deliver superior image quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s image processing is also likely more advanced, offering features like improved dynamic range and noise reduction.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 1080, built on a 6nm process, featuring a more powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the vivo Y78’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, also on 6nm, but with a less potent CPU arrangement of 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 1080 provide a significant advantage in single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both use a 6nm process, the architectural differences favor the Dimensity 1080 for more demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts a massive advantage in charging speed with its 120W wired charging, capable of a full charge in a claimed 19 minutes. The vivo Y78’s 44W charging is considerably slower. While the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ has an endurance rating of 88h, the faster charging mitigates concerns about battery life. The Y78 will likely offer good all-day battery life, but the convenience of the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s rapid charging is a significant benefit for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y78 if you prioritize a consistently stable, if less powerful, experience and value a more conservative approach to charging speeds. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and light multimedia consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ if you demand faster performance for gaming and demanding apps, and if you absolutely need the convenience of incredibly rapid 120W charging – perfect for users constantly on the move.