vivo Y78 vs Xiaomi Poco F5: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco F5 emerges as the clear winner, boasting a significantly more powerful chipset, faster charging, and a brighter display. While the vivo Y78 offers decent value, the Poco F5's superior performance and features justify its slightly higher price tag.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y78 | Xiaomi Poco F5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 29 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 10 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Flare Black, Dreamy Gold | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | - | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
vivo Y78
- Affordable
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Decent battery life
- 44W fast charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Dimmer display
- Potentially less impressive camera
- Slower charging compared to Poco F5
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset
- Bright and vibrant display
- Fast 67W charging
- Excellent battery life
- Likely better camera performance
- Slightly higher price
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes a commanding lead in the display department. Its 963 nits max brightness is significantly higher than the Y78, offering better visibility in sunlight. The Poco F5's infinite contrast ratio also suggests richer colors and deeper blacks. The Y78 likely has a decent display, but it can't compete with the Poco F5's superior specs.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Poco F5 likely has a more advanced camera system due to its superior chipset and processing power. Expect better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance from the Poco F5. Specific camera specs (megapixels, sensor size) would be needed for a more precise comparison, but the Poco F5 is generally expected to perform better.
Performance
The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in the Poco F5 is a substantial upgrade over the Snapdragon 695 in the Y78. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance on the Poco F5. The Poco F5's CPU architecture is also more advanced, further contributing to its performance advantage.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive battery life, with the Poco F5 achieving an endurance rating of 118h. The Y78's battery life is also likely very good, but the Poco F5's active use score of 11:52h suggests exceptional efficiency. The Poco F5's 67W charging is also significantly faster than the Y78's 44W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y78 is a good choice for users prioritizing a reliable and affordable device for everyday tasks and basic photography. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is ideal for gamers, content creators, and anyone who demands high performance, a vibrant display, and fast charging.