vivo Y78 vs Samsung Galaxy A71: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A71 generally edges out the vivo Y78 thanks to its superior display, established brand reputation, and slightly more versatile camera system. However, the Y78 boasts faster charging and a more modern chipset, making it a strong value proposition for budget-conscious users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y78 | Samsung Galaxy A71 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1x | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 29 | 2019, December 12. Released 2020, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 10 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) - GlobalQualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) - Philippines |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | ANT+ | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Flare Black, Dreamy Gold | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Pink |
| Models | - | SM-A715F, SM-A715F/DS, SM-A715F/DSN, SM-A715F/DSM, SM-A715W, SM-A715X |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.56 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -92.6dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 192 458(v7), 263396 (v8) GeekBench: 7039 (v4.4), 1733 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y78
- Faster 44W Charging
- Modern Snapdragon 695 5G Chipset
- Sleek Design
- 5G Connectivity
- Less Established Camera System
- Potentially Less Bright Display
- Brand Recognition (compared to Samsung)
Samsung Galaxy A71
- Vibrant Super AMOLED Display
- Reliable Brand Reputation
- Versatile Camera System
- Excellent Battery Life
- Slower 25W Charging
- Older Snapdragon 730/730G Chipset
- Potentially Higher Price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A71's Super AMOLED display shines with vibrant colors, deep blacks, and a measured peak brightness of 515 nits, offering a superior viewing experience. The vivo Y78 likely uses an AMOLED display as well, but lacks the same brightness and contrast. The A71's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) further enhances its visual appeal.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a more established reputation for its camera capabilities, offering a versatile setup with multiple lenses. While specific megapixel counts are not provided, the A71's image processing and software optimization are generally considered superior. The vivo Y78's camera is likely competent, but may not match the A71's overall image quality and features.
Performance
The vivo Y78's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm) offers a slight edge in efficiency and potentially raw performance compared to the Galaxy A71's Snapdragon 730/730G (8nm). Both are capable of handling everyday tasks and moderate gaming, but the Y78's newer architecture could translate to smoother multitasking and slightly better graphics performance. The 695 also supports 5G connectivity.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Galaxy A71 boasting an impressive endurance rating of 102 hours. The vivo Y78's battery capacity is likely comparable, ensuring all-day usage. However, the vivo Y78's 44W wired charging significantly outperforms the A71's 25W charging, allowing for much faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y78 is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging, a modern 5G chipset, and a sleek design on a tighter budget. The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, a reliable brand, and a more established camera experience, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed.