The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y77t and Oppo Reno10 Pro represent compelling options. The Y77t aims for value with its Dimensity 7020, while the Reno10 Pro leverages the established Snapdragon 778G and focuses on faster charging and potentially refined software. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device delivers the best experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a proven track record, the Oppo Reno10 Pro is the better choice. Its 80W charging significantly outperforms the Y77t’s 44W, and the Snapdragon 778G offers consistent performance. However, the Y77t may appeal to budget-conscious buyers willing to trade charging speed for potential savings.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 18 | 2023, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 18 | Available. Released 2023, July 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 80W wired, PD3.0, QC3
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Mint, Gold | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple |
| Models | - | CPH2525 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 229.99 / ₹ 31,999 |
vivo Y77t
- Potentially lower price point
- Modern Dimensity 7020 chipset
- Functional feature set for daily use
- Slower 44W charging
- Missing display brightness data
- Limited camera information
Oppo Reno10 Pro
- 80W fast charging with PD3.0/QC3
- Proven Snapdragon 778G performance
- Excellent battery life (11:05h active use)
- Higher price compared to Y77t (likely)
- Camera details are limited
- May not offer significant performance gains over Y77t in all scenarios
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 793 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Y77t, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both utilize 6nm chipsets, display technology details for the Y77t are missing; the Reno10 Pro’s panel likely benefits from Oppo’s color calibration expertise. Bezels are expected to be comparable given the similar market positioning, but the Reno10 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo Reno10 Pro’s camera system is described as offering both photo and video capabilities, but specific sensor details are absent. The vivo Y77t’s camera specifications are also unavailable. Given Oppo’s history, the Reno10 Pro likely prioritizes image processing algorithms for vibrant and shareable photos. Without knowing sensor sizes or aperture values, it’s impossible to determine which phone captures better low-light images or offers superior dynamic range. The absence of information on optical image stabilization (OIS) for either device further complicates the comparison.
Performance
Both phones employ 6nm chipsets, but the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G in the Reno10 Pro and the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 in the Y77t differ in CPU architecture. The Reno10 Pro features a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, while the Y77t has 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This suggests the Reno10 Pro may offer slightly better sustained performance in demanding tasks due to the higher clock speed of its primary core and the inclusion of more A78 cores. The Y77t’s six A55 cores could contribute to improved efficiency in lighter workloads. However, without GPU benchmarks, a definitive performance assessment is difficult.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno10 Pro shines with its 80W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3 standards, and even reverse wired charging. This allows for significantly faster top-ups compared to the vivo Y77t’s 44W charging. The Reno10 Pro’s endurance rating of 104 hours and active use score of 11:05h demonstrate excellent battery life. While the Y77t’s battery capacity is unknown, the Reno10 Pro’s combination of efficient chipset and fast charging provides a clear advantage for users who frequently need to recharge their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y77t if you need a capable daily driver and prioritize value for money, accepting a slower charging experience. You'll benefit from a modern chipset and a functional feature set without breaking the bank. Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro if you prefer a more polished experience with significantly faster 80W charging, a potentially brighter display, and the reliability of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon platform, even if it comes at a higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7020 in the vivo Y77t struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 7020 is a capable chipset, Genshin Impact is notoriously demanding. Expect to play at medium settings with moderate frame rates. The Snapdragon 778G in the Reno10 Pro may offer a slightly smoother experience, but neither phone will deliver flagship-level gaming performance.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Oppo Reno10 Pro from 0% to 100%?
With 80W charging, the Oppo Reno10 Pro can realistically charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 30-40 minutes, depending on usage during charging. This is a significant advantage over the Y77t’s 44W charging, which will likely take over an hour.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs for both phones a cause for concern?
Yes, it is. Without knowing sensor sizes, aperture values, and OIS availability, it's difficult to assess camera quality. However, Oppo generally focuses on software-driven image processing, so the Reno10 Pro may still deliver pleasing results, even with unknown hardware.
