The OnePlus Ace 2V and vivo Y77t represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both leverage Mediatek's Dimensity series, but a significant gap exists in their processing power and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects those differences, helping you determine which device best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Ace 2V is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 9000 chipset delivers substantially higher performance, and the 80W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the Y77t offers a more affordable entry point, the Ace 2V’s advantages justify the price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 18 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 18 | Available. Released 2023, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 191.5 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Mint, Gold | Black, Blue/Green |
| Models | - | PHP110 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 310 EUR |
vivo Y77t
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 7020 chipset
- Significantly slower charging (44W)
- Less powerful processor compared to the Ace 2V
- Likely lower-quality display
OnePlus Ace 2V
- Flagship-level Dimensity 9000 performance
- Ultra-fast 80W charging (0-100% in 32 minutes)
- Likely superior display quality and camera system
- Higher price tag
- May experience more heat under sustained load (though the 4nm process helps)
- Potentially larger physical size
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the Ace 2V's positioning, it likely features a higher-quality AMOLED panel with a higher refresh rate (potentially 120Hz) compared to the Y77t, which may utilize an LCD. The Ace 2V likely benefits from a higher peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Bezels are expected to be similar, but the Ace 2V may have a slightly more refined design. Color accuracy will depend on calibration, but OnePlus generally offers more accurate color profiles.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Ace 2V, being a higher-tier device, likely features a larger main sensor with a wider aperture, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Ace 2V is probable, further enhancing image quality and video stabilization. While both phones likely include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, the Ace 2V’s image processing algorithms are expected to be more sophisticated, delivering more natural and detailed photos. The Y77t may rely on software enhancements to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s Dimensity 9000, fabricated on a 4nm process, is a significant leap ahead of the vivo Y77t’s Dimensity 7020 (6nm). The 9000’s Cortex-X2 prime core (3.05 GHz) provides a substantial single-core performance boost, crucial for responsive app launches and demanding tasks. The Ace 2V’s Cortex-A710 performance cores (2.85 GHz) also outperform the Y77t’s Cortex-A78 cores (2.2 GHz). This translates to smoother multitasking, faster gaming frame rates, and improved overall system responsiveness. The 4nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Y77t will be adequate for everyday use, but the Ace 2V is the clear winner for power users.
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn't specified for either device, but the charging speeds are drastically different. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 32 minutes. The vivo Y77t’s 44W charging is considerably slower. Even if the Y77t has a slightly larger battery, the Ace 2V’s faster charging mitigates any capacity disadvantage. This means less time tethered to a charger and more time using the phone. The Ace 2V’s more efficient Dimensity 9000 may also contribute to better battery life despite potentially having a smaller capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y77t if you prioritize affordability and are a casual smartphone user who primarily focuses on everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption. Buy the OnePlus Ace 2V if you demand smoother multitasking, enjoy mobile gaming, and value significantly faster charging speeds – even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9000 in the OnePlus Ace 2V get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9000 is a powerful chip, the 4nm fabrication process helps mitigate heat generation. OnePlus also typically implements effective thermal management solutions. Expect some warmth during prolonged gaming, but significant throttling is unlikely. The Y77t's Dimensity 7020 will likely run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the vivo Y77t slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
Compared to the Ace 2V’s 80W charging, 44W is considerably slower. A full charge will take significantly longer, potentially over an hour. This is a trade-off for the lower price, but if fast charging is a priority, the Ace 2V is the better choice.
❓ Does the OnePlus Ace 2V support high refresh rate gaming, like 90fps or 120fps in popular titles?
The Dimensity 9000 is capable of driving high refresh rates in many games. Whether specific titles reach 90fps or 120fps depends on the game's optimization and graphics settings. However, the Ace 2V has the hardware to deliver a smooth gaming experience at higher frame rates.
