The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor X50 GT and vivo Y77t represent compelling options for users seeking strong performance without breaking the bank. However, they take drastically different approaches: the X50 GT leverages the older but still potent Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Y77t opts for the newer, more efficient Dimensity 7020. This comparison will dissect the key differences to determine which device delivers the best experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Honor X50 GT is the clear winner. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a significant leap in processing and graphics power over the Dimensity 7020. However, the vivo Y77t provides a respectable experience for everyday tasks and benefits from a slightly more efficient chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 18 | 2024, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 18 | Available. Released 2024, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 35W wired
7.5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Mint, Gold | Black, Silver |
| Models | - | ALP-AN00 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo Y77t
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Better thermal management for sustained performance
- Potential for higher refresh rate display
- 7.5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially lower battery life due to power-hungry chipset
- Slower wired charging (35W) compared to Y77t
Honor X50 GT
- More efficient Dimensity 7020 chipset
- Faster 44W wired charging
- Likely more affordable price point
- Good performance for everyday tasks
- Noticeably lower CPU and GPU performance
- May exhibit more throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the X50 GT's positioning, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel (potentially 120Hz or 144Hz) geared towards gaming. The Y77t, being a more budget-focused device, may utilize a standard 60Hz or 90Hz panel. Color accuracy and peak brightness will likely be superior on the X50 GT, reflecting its higher price point and focus on multimedia consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, the X50 GT, positioned as a gaming-focused device, may prioritize camera features appealing to content creators, potentially including larger sensors or more advanced image processing. The Y77t likely features a more basic camera setup focused on everyday photography. Lens apertures and OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) are key factors; if the X50 GT includes OIS on its main sensor, it will offer a significant advantage in low-light conditions. We can assume both devices will include a standard set of lenses, but the X50 GT is likely to have a more capable primary sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X50 GT’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This configuration delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the vivo Y77t’s Dimensity 7020 (6nm). The Dimensity 7020, with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is a capable mid-range chip, but it simply cannot match the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in demanding tasks. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The X50 GT will excel in graphically intensive games and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Honor X50 GT offers 35W wired charging, while the vivo Y77t supports 44W wired charging. While the Y77t has faster wired charging, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to be more power-hungry than the Dimensity 7020. The X50 GT also includes 7.5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Y77t. The actual battery life will depend on usage patterns, but the Dimensity 7020’s efficiency may allow the Y77t to achieve comparable or even slightly better battery life despite potentially having a smaller capacity battery. The 44W charging on the Y77t will provide quicker top-ups, but the Snapdragon's power draw will impact overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y77t if you need a reliable daily driver for social media, browsing, and light gaming, and value a balance between performance and efficiency. Buy the Honor X50 GT if you prioritize demanding mobile gaming, content creation, or frequently use resource-intensive applications, and are willing to trade some battery efficiency for significantly higher performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor X50 GT overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, it's known to generate heat. However, the 4nm process node and potential for effective thermal management in the X50 GT should mitigate significant throttling. Expect some performance reduction after extended gaming, but it should remain playable.
❓ Is the Dimensity 7020 in the vivo Y77t powerful enough for demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Dimensity 7020 can run these games, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. It's suitable for casual gaming, but hardcore gamers will find the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the X50 GT a much better experience.
❓ Does the Honor X50 GT support high frame rate gaming (90fps or 120fps) in popular titles?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is capable of supporting high frame rates. Whether the X50 GT specifically supports 90fps or 120fps will depend on game optimization and the display's refresh rate. It's highly likely to offer a smoother gaming experience than the Y77t.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the vivo Y77t with its 44W charging?
Based on typical 44W charging speeds, a full charge from 0% to 100% on the vivo Y77t should take approximately 50-60 minutes, assuming optimal charging conditions.
