The vivo Y77e and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$250 4G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience, they take different approaches to achieving it, primarily diverging in their chipset and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and potentially smoother multitasking, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the vivo Y77e’s 18W, and the Snapdragon 732G, built on an 8nm process, offers a slight edge in efficiency. However, the Y77e remains a viable option for those seeking a slightly newer chipset architecture.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 12 | 2023, March 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 12 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 201.8 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 700 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue gradient, Pink | Star Blue, Graphite Gray, Polar White, Ice blue |
| Models | V2166BA | 2209116AG, 2209116AG |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 150 EUR |
vivo Y77e
- More recent chipset architecture (Dimensity 810)
- Potentially slightly better single-core performance
- 6nm process offers good efficiency
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Potentially less optimized thermal management
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
- 67W fast charging for rapid top-ups
- 8nm Snapdragon 732G offers good efficiency
- Mature chipset architecture with optimized performance
- Older chipset generation
- Potentially less impressive single-core performance
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on internal components, we can infer both likely feature standard LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both are likely 60Hz. Bezels are expected to be moderate, and color accuracy will likely be tuned for vibrant, rather than color-accurate, visuals. Without specific display specs, a clear winner is difficult to determine.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G, given Xiaomi’s camera focus, might prioritize image processing algorithms for more vibrant and shareable photos. The larger sensor size (if present, which is common in Redmi Pro models) would also give it an edge in low-light performance. We can expect both to struggle with detail in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo Y77e utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) while the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm). While clock speeds are close – 2.4GHz vs 2.2GHz for the prime cores – the 8nm process of the Snapdragon 732G generally translates to better power efficiency. The Dimensity 810’s newer Cortex-A76 cores *may* offer a slight advantage in single-core performance, but the Snapdragon 732G’s optimized architecture and potentially better thermal management could lead to more sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. The Y77e's 6nm node is more efficient, but the Snapdragon 732G's architecture is more mature.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. This allows for a significantly faster 0-100% charge compared to the vivo Y77e’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. Users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery will overwhelmingly benefit from the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G’s charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y77e if you prioritize a more recent chipset architecture (Dimensity 810) and are less concerned with rapid charging. It's a good fit for users who primarily browse, use social media, and engage in light gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G if you value significantly faster charging speeds, potentially smoother multitasking due to the Snapdragon 732G’s optimization, and a generally more efficient power profile. This phone suits users who are frequently on the go and need to quickly top up their battery.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 810 in the vivo Y77e struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 810 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G might offer slightly more consistent performance due to its optimized architecture and thermal management, potentially allowing for higher settings without significant frame drops.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G with the 67W charger?
Xiaomi claims the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G can charge from 0-100% in around 46 minutes with the 67W charger. Real-world results may vary slightly depending on usage during charging, but it’s significantly faster than the vivo Y77e’s 18W charging, which will likely take well over 2 hours for a full charge.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 732G still a relevant chipset in 2024?
While not the newest chipset, the Snapdragon 732G remains a capable performer for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Its 8nm process and optimized architecture provide a good balance of performance and efficiency, making it a solid choice for budget-conscious users.
