The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y77e and Samsung Galaxy A54 represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of features and affordability. While both aim to deliver a solid experience, they take different approaches to achieving it. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and long-term software support, the Samsung Galaxy A54 is the better choice. However, the vivo Y77e presents a strong value proposition, offering respectable performance at a potentially lower price point, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 12 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 12 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue gradient, Pink | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | V2166BA | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y77e
- Potentially lower price point
- Respectable performance for everyday tasks
- 5G connectivity
- Limited display information suggests a less impressive screen
- Slower charging speed (18W)
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Brighter and higher-quality display (980 nits)
- More powerful and efficient Exynos 1380 chipset
- Excellent battery life (11:15h active use, 119h endurance)
- Likely higher price tag
- May not offer significant camera improvements over competitors
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 980 nits, compared to an unstated value for the vivo Y77e. This brightness advantage translates to better visibility outdoors. While the Y77e’s display specs are not provided, Samsung’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The A54’s panel likely benefits from Samsung’s display expertise, offering potentially better color accuracy and viewing angles. The lack of detailed display information for the Y77e makes a precise comparison difficult, but the A54 clearly leads in this category.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information for either phone, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally more refined, offering better dynamic range and color accuracy. The Y77e likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for potentially less capable hardware. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Y77e is a common, but often underwhelming, feature in this price range. The A54’s camera system, while details are missing, is likely to provide a more consistent and higher-quality photographic experience.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A54’s Exynos 1380, fabricated on a 5nm process, offers a theoretical advantage in power efficiency and performance over the vivo Y77e’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm). The A54’s CPU configuration – 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – is architecturally more advanced than the Y77e’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Exynos 1380 deliver higher single-core performance, beneficial for responsive app launching and smoother multitasking. While both chips are octa-core, the A54’s architecture suggests a more capable overall experience, particularly in demanding applications. The Y77e will handle daily tasks well, but the A54 is better equipped for sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A54 achieves an impressive endurance rating of 119 hours and a real-world active use score of 11:15h, indicating excellent battery life. The vivo Y77e’s battery capacity and performance are not specified, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the A54’s 25W wired charging is faster than the Y77e’s 18W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups. While the Y77e may offer adequate battery life for typical usage, the A54’s superior endurance and faster charging provide a more convenient and reliable experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y77e if you need a capable 5G phone for everyday tasks and light gaming, and prioritize value for money above all else. You'll appreciate its efficient Dimensity 810 chipset for handling common apps. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, a more refined camera experience, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung's robust software update policy and longer endurance rating.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1380, built on a 5nm process, is generally efficient and well-managed in the Galaxy A54. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, Samsung’s thermal management system is typically effective at preventing significant throttling. User reports suggest the A54 maintains stable performance for extended periods, though prolonged, demanding tasks will naturally increase temperatures.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo Y77e slow compared to other phones in this price range?
Yes, 18W charging is relatively slow compared to the 25W charging offered by the Samsung Galaxy A54 and increasingly common in the mid-range segment. While 18W will still charge the device overnight, it will take considerably longer to reach a full charge from a low battery level, impacting convenience for users who need quick top-ups.
❓ How does the Dimensity 810 handle graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 810 can run PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to compromise on graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. Expect to play at medium settings for a balanced experience. The Exynos 1380 in the A54 offers a more comfortable experience for gaming, allowing for higher graphics settings and more stable performance.
❓ What kind of software updates can I expect from vivo for the Y77e?
Vivo's software update policy for the Y77e is less extensive than Samsung's. While the Y77e will receive security patches and potentially one major Android version update, Samsung typically provides longer-term software support, including multiple Android updates and security patches, making the A54 a better choice for users who prioritize long-term software support.
