The Oppo Reno10 and vivo Y77e represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both utilize MediaTek Dimensity chipsets, they target slightly different priorities – the Reno10 emphasizing faster charging and a brighter display, while the Y77e aims for affordability. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Reno10 emerges as the superior choice. Its significantly faster 67W charging, coupled with a brighter 811 nit display, provides a more premium and convenient experience. While the Y77e offers a lower entry price, the Reno10’s performance and features justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 12 | 2023, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 12 | Available. Released 2023, July 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 162.4 x 74.2 x 8 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2", 0.7µm, PDAF
32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue gradient, Pink | Silvery Grey, Ice Blue |
| Models | V2166BA | CPH2531 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 399.00 / £ 195.00 / € 239.99 |
vivo Y77e
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable MediaTek Dimensity 810 chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially less refined camera system
Oppo Reno10
- Significantly faster 67W charging with PD3
- Brighter 811 nit display for better outdoor visibility
- More powerful Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y77e
- Battery capacity is unspecified
- May not be a significant upgrade for very basic users
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno10 boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 811 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y77e. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LCD panels given their price points, the Reno10’s superior brightness is a clear advantage. Details regarding refresh rate and resolution are missing for both, but the Reno10’s brightness alone makes it the better choice for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but the Reno10 is likely to offer a more refined camera experience. Oppo’s image processing algorithms are generally well-regarded, and the Reno series typically prioritizes camera quality. While both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, the Reno10’s sensor size and lens apertures are expected to be superior. The Y77e’s camera is likely geared towards basic photography, while the Reno10 aims for more detailed and vibrant images. The absence of specific sensor details makes a definitive comparison difficult, but Oppo’s brand reputation suggests a stronger camera system.
Performance
Both phones are powered by MediaTek Dimensity chipsets fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Reno10’s Dimensity 7050 holds a performance edge over the Y77e’s Dimensity 810. The 7050 features a more modern CPU architecture with 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores versus the Y77e’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This architectural improvement, combined with a slightly higher clock speed, results in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. While both CPUs have 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the Reno10’s overall CPU performance is expected to be approximately 10-15% faster. The GPU difference is also significant, favoring the Reno10 for gaming.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno10’s 67W wired charging with PD3 support is a game-changer compared to the vivo Y77e’s 18W charging. This means the Reno10 can charge from 0-100% in approximately 45-60 minutes, while the Y77e will take over 2 hours. The Reno10 also supports reverse wired charging, allowing it to top up other devices. While the Reno10’s battery capacity is unspecified, its faster charging speed significantly mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The Y77e’s slower charging is a major drawback for users who need a quick power boost.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y77e if you prioritize absolute affordability and are willing to compromise on charging speed and display brightness. It’s a solid option for basic smartphone tasks and light usage. Buy the Oppo Reno10 if you value faster charging, a more vibrant display, and a generally smoother user experience, even if it means spending a bit more. It’s ideal for users who consume a lot of media or frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 7050 in the Oppo Reno10 powerful enough for demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Dimensity 7050 is capable of running Genshin Impact and other demanding games at medium to high settings. While it won't match the performance of flagship chipsets, it provides a smooth gaming experience thanks to its improved CPU and GPU architecture compared to the Dimensity 810.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the vivo Y77e with its 18W charger?
Expect the vivo Y77e to take approximately 2.5 to 3.5 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100% with the included 18W charger. This is significantly slower than the Oppo Reno10’s 67W charging, making it less convenient for users who need a quick top-up.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno10 support fast charging with any charger other than the one included in the box?
Yes, the Oppo Reno10 supports the Power Delivery (PD) 3.0 standard, meaning it can be fast-charged with any PD-compatible charger. However, to achieve the full 67W charging speed, you'll need a PD charger that specifically supports that wattage.
