The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y77e (t1) and Oppo Reno8 T 5G represent compelling options for users seeking 5G connectivity without breaking the bank. This comparison dives deep into their core specifications, focusing on the key differences in chipset performance and charging capabilities to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more refined user experience, the Oppo Reno8 T 5G emerges as the winner. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a balanced performance profile. However, the Y77e (t1) remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 19 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue gradient, Pink | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | V2166BA | CPH2505 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 340 EUR |
vivo Y77e (t1)
- Potentially slightly higher CPU performance due to Dimensity 810's Cortex-A76 cores.
- More affordable price point.
- Functional 5G connectivity.
- Significantly slower 18W charging.
- Likely less optimized software experience.
- Potentially weaker GPU performance for gaming.
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- 67W fast charging with a 44-minute full charge time.
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 offers balanced performance and efficiency.
- Reverse wired charging capability.
- Potentially slightly lower CPU performance compared to the Dimensity 810.
- Higher price tag.
- May not include all accessories in the box.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, both utilize 6nm chipsets suggesting a focus on efficiency over pushing display boundaries. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment. The absence of high refresh rate panels on either device indicates a cost-saving measure, prioritizing battery life over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the emphasis will be on the main sensor. Without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit. Image processing will likely differ, with Oppo historically favoring more vibrant, saturated images, while vivo tends towards a more natural look. OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is unlikely on either device at this price point.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo Y77e (t1) features the Mediatek Dimensity 810, while the Oppo Reno8 T 5G uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 810, with its Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, theoretically offers a slight edge in raw CPU performance compared to the Snapdragon 695’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. However, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon typically excels in GPU performance and software optimization, potentially leading to a smoother gaming experience on the Reno8 T. Both utilize 6nm fabrication, offering reasonable power efficiency, but the Snapdragon 695’s architecture is generally considered more efficient. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR4X is likely on both, limiting memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. Oppo claims a full charge in just 44 minutes, a significant advantage over the vivo Y77e (t1)’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference. The Reno8 T also supports reverse wired charging, allowing it to top up other devices – a feature absent on the Y77e (t1). This makes the Reno8 T the clear winner for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y77e (t1) if you need a functional 5G smartphone with decent performance for everyday tasks and prioritize affordability above all else. Buy the Oppo Reno8 T 5G if you prefer significantly faster charging speeds, a more modern aesthetic, and a slightly more responsive user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo Reno8 T 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to stick to medium graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. The Dimensity 810 in the Y77e (t1) might offer slightly higher frame rates at similar settings, but the Snapdragon 695’s optimization could provide a more stable experience overall.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo Reno8 T 5G compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y77e (t1) in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G can go from 0% to 100% in approximately 44 minutes. The vivo Y77e (t1) with its 18W charging will likely take over 2 hours to achieve a full charge. This means significantly less time tethered to a wall outlet with the Reno8 T.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno8 T 5G support 5G carrier aggregation for faster data speeds?
The Snapdragon 695 supports 5G carrier aggregation, allowing it to combine multiple 5G channels for potentially faster download and upload speeds, provided your carrier supports it. The Y77e (t1)'s 5G capabilities are less well-defined, and may not support the same level of carrier aggregation.
