The sub-$200 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y77e (t1) and Oppo K10x both aim to deliver connectivity and functionality without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The Y77e prioritizes a balance of efficiency with its Dimensity 810, while the K10x aggressively targets charging speed with its 67W SuperVOOC technology. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Oppo K10x is the clear winner. Its 67W charging, capable of reaching 80% in just 33 minutes, significantly outperforms the vivo Y77e’s 18W charging. While the Y77e offers a slightly different CPU architecture, the K10x’s charging advantage is a compelling benefit for those on the go.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 19 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue gradient, Pink | Blue, Black |
| Models | V2166BA | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 210 EUR |
vivo Y77e (t1)
- Potentially slightly better multi-core CPU performance due to Cortex-A76 cores.
- Efficient 6nm Dimensity 810 chipset.
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks.
- Significantly slower 18W charging.
- Likely less optimized GPU performance for gaming.
Oppo K10x
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (80% in 33 minutes).
- Snapdragon 695 offers good GPU performance.
- Efficient chipset for extended battery life.
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds compared to the Y77e.
- May not excel in demanding multi-tasking scenarios.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the price bracket, we can assume both utilize LCD panels, though specific details like resolution and refresh rate are absent. The focus here is on efficiency. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will be standard for this segment. Without further data, it's difficult to declare a clear winner; both will likely offer a functional, if unremarkable, viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, leaning towards adequate for social media sharing rather than professional photography. Both phones likely feature a primary sensor around the 50MP mark, but details regarding sensor size and aperture are missing. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on both is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit. Image processing will likely prioritize vibrant colors and boosted contrast, typical of this price segment. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to assess dynamic range or low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y77e (t1) features the Mediatek Dimensity 810, utilizing a 6nm process and an octa-core configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Oppo K10x employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (also 6nm) with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While clock speeds are slightly higher on the Dimensity 810, the architectural differences – Cortex-A76 vs Kryo 660 Gold – mean real-world performance will be nuanced. The Dimensity 810 may exhibit slightly better multi-core performance, while the Snapdragon 695 often demonstrates stronger GPU performance. Both are paired with adequate RAM for smooth multitasking, but the lack of LPDDR5x specification suggests standard LPDDR4x is used in both, limiting memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
The Oppo K10x’s 67W wired charging is the standout feature here. Achieving 80% charge in 33 minutes is a significant advantage over the vivo Y77e’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference. The Snapdragon 695’s efficiency, combined with the rapid charging, means users can quickly top up their battery throughout the day, minimizing range anxiety. The Y77e’s slower charging will require longer periods plugged in, making it less convenient for users with busy lifestyles.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y77e (t1) if you need a phone with a focus on sustained performance and are less concerned with ultra-fast charging. Its Dimensity 810 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a good balance of power and efficiency for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Oppo K10x if you prioritize minimizing downtime and need a phone that can quickly top up its battery, making it ideal for users who frequently find themselves away from a power source.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K10x struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to stick to medium graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. While not a dedicated gaming chip, it offers sufficient GPU power for casual gaming, and the efficient thermal design should prevent significant throttling during moderate gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo K10x compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y77e in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Oppo K10x can reach 80% charge in approximately 33 minutes, while the vivo Y77e will likely take well over two hours to fully charge. This means you can quickly top up the K10x during a short break, whereas the Y77e requires a more significant charging commitment.
❓ Does the vivo Y77e (t1) support 5G connectivity, and what 5G bands are compatible?
Yes, the vivo Y77e (t1) utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 810, which includes integrated 5G modem. Specific 5G band compatibility will vary by region and carrier, so it's crucial to check with your local provider to ensure compatibility before purchasing.
