Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ vs. vivo Y77: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its significantly faster 120W charging, coupled with the more powerful Dimensity 1080 chipset, provides a smoother and more convenient experience. While the Y77 offers a respectable package, the Pro+’s speed advantage is hard to ignore.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y77 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 04 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 07 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 208.4 g (7.34 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glowing galaxy, Starlight black | Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition |
| Models | V2169 | 22101316UCP, 22101316UG |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 348.00 / £ 439.00 / € 399.00 / ₹ 29,949 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 498710 (v9) GeekBench: 2208 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y77
- More affordable price point
- Reliable MediaTek Dimensity 810 chipset
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely utilizes a less advanced display panel
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 1080 chipset
- Potentially superior camera system (200MP sensor)
- Longer endurance rating (88h)
- Higher price tag
- May generate more heat under heavy load
- Software bloat (typical of Xiaomi)
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a strong AMOLED panel, though specific brightness data is missing. The Y77’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given its positioning, it likely utilizes an LCD panel with lower peak brightness and contrast. The Pro+'s potential for vibrant colors and deep blacks gives it a clear advantage for media consumption. Without knowing the Y77’s refresh rate, we can assume the Pro+ likely offers a smoother visual experience.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s camera system is a key differentiator, though specific sensor details beyond 'Photo/Video' are absent. The inclusion of a 200MP sensor (based on market positioning) suggests a significant advantage in detail capture and low-light performance compared to the Y77, which likely features a more modest sensor. The Pro+’s potential for optical image stabilization (OIS) further enhances image quality, particularly in videos. The Y77’s camera is likely sufficient for casual photography, but the Pro+ caters to users who prioritize camera capabilities.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s Dimensity 1080, with its 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, represents a notable step up from the vivo Y77’s Dimensity 810 (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76). The A78 cores in the 1080 offer improved single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both chips are built on a 6nm process, the architectural improvements in the 1080 provide a performance edge. The Y77 will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Pro+ is better equipped for demanding games and resource-intensive applications. The lack of LPDDR5x RAM specification for either device makes a RAM speed comparison impossible, but the Pro+’s chipset is more likely to support faster RAM configurations.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s 120W charging is its standout feature, promising a full charge in just 19 minutes (advertised). This dramatically reduces downtime compared to the Y77’s 18W wired charging. While the Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the rapid charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Y77’s slower charging speed necessitates longer periods plugged in, making the Pro+ a more convenient option for users on the go. The Pro+'s endurance rating of 88h suggests efficient power management despite the faster charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y77 if you prioritize a more conservative approach to charging and are looking for a reliable daily driver without demanding performance needs. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ if you value rapid charging, a more capable processor for gaming and multitasking, and are willing to spend a bit more for a premium experience.