Oppo Reno 10x Zoom vs vivo Y77: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom offers a more compelling package. While the Dimensity 810 in the vivo Y77 is more power efficient, the Snapdragon 855’s superior CPU and GPU performance, coupled with the Reno’s established endurance rating, provide a smoother and more capable experience, especially for demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y77 | Oppo Reno 10x zoom |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 04 | 2019, April. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 07 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF OIS, 5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glowing galaxy, Starlight black | Ocean Green, Jet Black, Mist Pink, Ocean Blue |
| Models | V2169 | CPH1919, PCCM00 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 1020 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 107h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 364220 (v7), 407473 (v8) GeekBench: 10395 (v4.4), 2103 (v5.1) GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y77
- More powerful Snapdragon 855 processor
- Potentially better camera system with zoom capabilities
- Faster 20W wired charging
- Older chipset, potentially shorter software support
- May run warmer under sustained load
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- More power-efficient Dimensity 810 processor
- Likely more affordable price point
- Potentially longer software support
- Significantly less powerful processor
- Likely a less capable camera system
- Slower 18W wired charging
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom boasts a measured peak brightness of 440 nits, which, while not exceptional by today’s standards, is adequate for most viewing conditions. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggests a typical OLED panel, offering deep blacks. The vivo Y77’s display specifications are not provided, but given its market positioning, it likely features an LCD panel with lower brightness and contrast. This makes the Reno 10x Zoom the better choice for outdoor visibility and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. The Reno 10x Zoom’s name suggests a focus on zoom capabilities, likely utilizing a periscope lens system. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, the Reno’s flagship aspirations likely mean a larger, more capable main sensor. The Y77’s camera system is likely more basic, geared towards everyday snapshots. Without specific sensor details, it’s reasonable to assume the Reno 10x Zoom offers superior image quality and versatility, particularly in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) features a Kryo 485 architecture with a prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, offering significantly higher peak performance than the vivo Y77’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm). While the Dimensity 810’s 6nm process is more efficient, the Snapdragon 855’s superior architecture and clock speeds translate to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The Snapdragon 855’s Adreno 640 GPU also provides a substantial advantage in graphics-intensive tasks. The Y77's Cortex-A76 cores are capable, but fall short of the Kryo 485's sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 107 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite the Y77’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the Reno 10x Zoom’s 20W wired charging is slightly faster than the Y77’s 18W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups. The Dimensity 810’s efficiency may offset the Reno’s faster charging in some scenarios, but the Snapdragon 855’s performance advantage means it may draw more power during intensive use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y77 if you prioritize long-term software support and efficient power consumption for everyday tasks like browsing and social media. Its Dimensity 810 chipset is well-suited for casual gaming and offers a good balance of performance and battery life. Buy the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom if you value raw performance for gaming, photography, and multitasking, and are comfortable with a device that may have a shorter software support lifecycle. The Snapdragon 855 delivers a noticeable performance boost over the Dimensity 810.