vivo Y77 vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and speed, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the clear winner. Its 68W charging, capable of adding 50% charge in just 15 minutes, dramatically outperforms the vivo Y77’s 18W charging. While the Y77 offers a respectable processor, the Edge 40 Neo’s superior battery endurance and faster charging make it the more practical choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y77 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 04 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 07 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glowing galaxy, Starlight black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2169 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo Y77
- Potentially lower price point
- Respectable Dimensity 810 performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable MediaTek chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely shorter battery life
- Display likely less bright than the Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- 68W fast charging (50% in 15 minutes)
- Longer battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Potentially higher price
- Dimensity 7030 offers a marginal performance increase
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, especially in direct sunlight. While the vivo Y77’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to fall short of this level of brightness. The Edge 40 Neo’s higher brightness also suggests a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. We can infer that the Edge 40 Neo will offer a superior visual experience, particularly for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices is limited regarding camera specifics. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s inclusion of 'Photo / Video' suggests a more versatile camera system. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. It’s reasonable to assume Motorola, with its established camera reputation, will offer more refined image processing algorithms. The Y77’s camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but the Edge 40 Neo is positioned to deliver higher-quality results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
Both phones utilize MediaTek Dimensity chipsets, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 holds a slight edge over the vivo Y77’s Dimensity 810. The 7030 features Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, compared to the Y77’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz. While both are octa-core designs with similar Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the A78 architecture generally offers better single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The 6nm fabrication process is shared, meaning thermal efficiency should be comparable, but the Edge 40 Neo will likely exhibit slightly better responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery department. Its active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80h demonstrate significantly longer battery life than what we’d expect from the vivo Y77, given its 18W charging. The 68W wired charging capability is a game-changer, allowing for a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime and provides a level of convenience the Y77 simply cannot match. While the Y77’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the slower charging speed suggests it’s likely smaller or less efficiently charged.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y77 if you prioritize a lower upfront cost and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid option for basic smartphone tasks and light usage. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value fast charging, longer battery life, and a brighter display. It’s ideal for users who are frequently on the go and need a phone that can keep up with their demanding lifestyle.