The vivo Y77 and Honor X8a represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The Y77 leverages the more modern and efficient Dimensity 810 chipset, while the X8a opts for the Helio G88. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the vivo Y77 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 810 chipset, built on a 6nm process, provides a noticeable advantage in CPU and GPU capabilities over the Honor X8a’s 12nm Helio G88, despite the X8a’s faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 04 | 2023, February 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 07 | Available. Released 2023, February 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 74.5 x 7.5 mm (6.41 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Triple | - | 100 MP, f/1.9, (wide), AF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (CRT-LX1 only) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 22.5W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glowing galaxy, Starlight black | Cyan Lake, Titanium Silver, Midnight Black |
| Models | V2169 | CRT-LX1, CRT-LX2, CRT-LX3 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 170 EUR |
vivo Y77
- More powerful Dimensity 810 chipset
- Greater CPU and GPU performance
- More efficient 6nm fabrication process
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely lacks advanced display features
Honor X8a
- Faster 22.5W charging with 30-minute 50% boost
- Potentially better color calibration (Honor's strength)
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful Helio G88 chipset
- Less efficient 12nm fabrication process
- Potential for thermal throttling under load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on internals, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both are likely capped at 60Hz. The real difference will likely come down to color calibration and peak brightness, areas where Honor historically performs well. However, without specific data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests both phones will feature a primary camera as the main selling point. The absence of information regarding sensor size or OIS implies both likely utilize basic camera setups. Image processing will be a key differentiator, with vivo often leaning towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Honor tends towards more natural tones. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device is questionable, offering minimal benefit in most scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y77’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A76 cores – compared to the Honor X8a’s Helio G88 (12nm) with Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to a roughly 20-30% performance uplift in CPU-intensive tasks for the Y77. The 6nm fabrication process also contributes to better power efficiency, reducing thermal throttling during prolonged use. While the Helio G88 is adequate for everyday tasks, the Dimensity 810 offers a smoother experience with multitasking and more demanding apps. The GPU difference is also significant, favoring the Y77 for gaming.
Battery Life
The Honor X8a’s 22.5W charging is a clear advantage over the vivo Y77’s 18W charging. Honor claims a 50% charge in 30 minutes, which is a significant convenience. However, battery life isn’t solely determined by charging speed. The Dimensity 810’s superior power efficiency in the Y77 could offset the slightly slower charging, resulting in comparable real-world battery endurance. Without knowing the battery capacity of each device, it’s difficult to definitively say which will last longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y77 if you need a phone capable of handling more demanding applications, multitasking, and occasional gaming without significant slowdown. Its more efficient chipset translates to better long-term performance. Buy the Honor X8a if you prioritize quick top-ups and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. The 22.5W charging is a definite plus for those who frequently find themselves with low battery.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G88 in the Honor X8a struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio G88 can run PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a stable frame rate. The Dimensity 810 in the vivo Y77 offers a significantly better gaming experience, allowing for higher settings and smoother gameplay.
❓ How much of a difference will the 6nm process of the Dimensity 810 make in real-world battery life compared to the 12nm Helio G88?
The 6nm process is considerably more power-efficient. While the Honor X8a charges faster, the vivo Y77’s chipset will draw less power during typical usage, potentially leading to comparable or even better overall battery life, despite the slower charging speed.
❓ Is the 22.5W charging on the Honor X8a a game-changer for quick top-ups?
For users who frequently find themselves with low battery and need a quick boost, the 22.5W charging is a significant advantage. Reaching 50% charge in 30 minutes is a convenient feature, especially when you only have a short window to charge.
