Honor X50 GT vs vivo Y77: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown

The Honor X50 GT and vivo Y77 represent compelling options in the competitive Chinese mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a strong user experience, they take drastically different approaches to achieving it. The X50 GT leverages Qualcomm’s flagship-adjacent Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Y77 opts for MediaTek’s Dimensity 930. This comparison dissects these choices, focusing on performance, charging, and overall value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Honor X50 GT is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. However, the vivo Y77’s 80W charging offers a significant convenience factor, making it a strong contender for those who value speed of replenishment over sustained peak performance.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo Y77 (China) Honor X50 GT
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41LTE
5G bands1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSASA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1x -
Launch
Announced2022, July 082024, January 04
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, July 11Available. Released 2024, January 09
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic back-
Dimensions164.2 x 75.8 x 8.6 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.34 in)163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight194 g (6.84 oz)192 g (6.77 oz)
Display
Resolution1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density)1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density)
Size6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio)6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
GPUIMG BXM-8-256Adreno 730
OSAndroid 12, OriginOS OceanAndroid 13, MagicOS 7.2
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
 UFS 2.2-
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro)108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)-
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack Yes-
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass
Battery
Charging80W wired35W wired 7.5W reverse wired
Type4500 mAhLi-Po 5800 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Silver, BlueBlack, Silver
ModelsV2219AALP-AN00
PriceAbout 300 EURAbout 260 EUR

vivo Y77 (China)

  • Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
  • Superior thermal efficiency for sustained performance
  • Reverse wired charging capability

  • Slower wired charging (35W)
  • Potentially higher price point

Honor X50 GT

  • Extremely fast wired charging (80W)
  • Potentially more affordable price
  • Good balance of performance for everyday tasks

  • Less powerful processor (Dimensity 930)
  • May exhibit more throttling under heavy load

Display Comparison

Display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both devices likely utilize AMOLED panels. The X50 GT, positioned as a gaming-focused device, may benefit from a higher refresh rate. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests a trade-off between smoothness and power efficiency. Bezels are likely similar, with both manufacturers aiming for modern, minimal designs. Color accuracy will depend on calibration, but both brands generally offer vibrant, saturated displays geared towards the Chinese market.

Camera Comparison

Camera details are absent, making a detailed comparison impossible. However, given the market segment, both phones likely feature multi-camera systems. The X50 GT, with its more powerful processor, may offer more advanced image processing capabilities, such as better low-light performance and more sophisticated computational photography features. Sensor size is critical; a larger sensor generally captures more light and produces better images. The absence of information prevents us from assessing this. We can assume both phones will include a primary wide-angle lens, an ultrawide lens, and potentially a macro lens (though the usefulness of 2MP macro lenses is often limited).

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X50 GT’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a significant leap over the vivo Y77’s Dimensity 930 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This contrasts with the Y77’s dual Cortex-A78 and six Cortex-A55 configuration. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides superior thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. While the Dimensity 930 is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers substantially higher CPU and GPU performance. The X50 GT will likely handle graphically intensive games at higher settings and maintain smoother frame rates. RAM specifications are unknown, but LPDDR5X would be a significant advantage for the X50 GT, further enhancing performance.

Battery Life

The Honor X50 GT’s 35W wired charging is significantly slower than the vivo Y77’s 80W wired charging. While battery capacity is unknown for both devices, the Y77’s faster charging will result in considerably quicker top-ups. An 80W charger can potentially replenish a 4500mAh battery to 100% in under 40 minutes, while the X50 GT will likely take over an hour. The X50 GT does offer 7.5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Y77, allowing it to charge other devices, albeit slowly. The trade-off is clear: the Y77 prioritizes charging speed, while the X50 GT offers the convenience of reverse wireless charging.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo Y77 (China) if you need exceptionally fast charging and prioritize a balance between performance and battery life for everyday tasks. Buy the Honor X50 GT if you prefer a more powerful processor for demanding games, multitasking, and applications, and are willing to trade some charging speed for that extra horsepower.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor X50 GT get noticeably hotter than the Dimensity 930 during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is more powerful, its 4nm process node is more efficient than the Dimensity 930’s 6nm node. This means the X50 GT will likely manage heat better, resulting in less throttling and more sustained performance during long gaming sessions, despite potentially reaching higher peak temperatures.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the vivo Y77 compared to the 35W charging on the Honor X50 GT in real-world use?
The 80W charging on the Y77 can add a significant amount of charge in a short period. Expect a 0-100% charge in under 40 minutes, potentially even closer to 30 minutes depending on battery capacity. The X50 GT’s 35W charging will likely take over an hour, making the Y77 a much more convenient option for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Honor X50 GT’s reverse charging feature allow for fast charging of other devices?
No, the Honor X50 GT’s reverse wired charging is limited to 7.5W. This is sufficient for charging accessories like earbuds or smartwatches, but it will be very slow for charging smartphones or other larger devices. It’s primarily a convenience feature rather than a fast-charging solution.