Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The vivo Y76s and Samsung Galaxy A71 are both solid mid-range contenders, but cater to slightly different priorities. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which device best fits your lifestyle and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo Y76s boasts significantly faster charging and a more modern chipset, offering a smoother experience. However, the Galaxy A71’s proven battery life and potentially better camera (depending on the variant) make it a strong contender. Ultimately, the Y76s wins for performance, while the A71 excels in longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 10 | 2019, December 12. Released 2020, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 20 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 7.8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) - GlobalQualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) - Philippines |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 34 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4100 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora, Silver | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Pink |
| Models | V2156A | SM-A715F, SM-A715F/DS, SM-A715F/DSN, SM-A715F/DSM, SM-A715W, SM-A715X |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.56 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -92.6dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 192 458(v7), 263396 (v8)
GeekBench: 7039 (v4.4), 1733 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y76s
- Faster Charging (44W)
- Modern Dimensity 810 Chipset
- Sleek Design
- Good Value
- Battery Life Not as Long as A71
- Camera May Not Be as Consistent
Samsung Galaxy A71
- Exceptional Battery Life (102h Endurance)
- Reliable Camera System
- Samsung One UI
- Good Display Brightness
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Older Chipset
- Can Feel Dated
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A71 generally offers a slightly better display experience with its infinite contrast ratio (though nominal) and measured 515 nits brightness. While the Y76s display is good, it lacks specific brightness data. Both offer vibrant colors and good viewing angles, but the A71 has a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is nuanced. The Galaxy A71 has a reputation for reliable image quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. The Y76s camera is competent, but may not match the A71's overall consistency. The A71 variant with the 730G may offer slightly improved camera processing. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities.
Performance
The vivo Y76s's Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset (6nm) provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Galaxy A71's Snapdragon 730/730G (8nm). The Dimensity 810 offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and improved gaming capabilities. The Y76s is the clear winner here.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A71 shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 102 hours. The vivo Y76s, while having a decent battery, doesn't match this longevity. However, the Y76s compensates with its 44W fast charging, allowing it to quickly top up when needed.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y76s is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, a modern processor for gaming and multitasking, and a sleek design. The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a better choice for those who value exceptional battery life, a reliable camera system, and the familiarity of Samsung's One UI.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo Y76s is the better choice for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 810 chipset.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A71 have expandable storage?
Yes, the Samsung Galaxy A71 supports microSD card expansion.
❓ Which phone has the better software support?
Samsung generally provides longer software update support than vivo, making the Galaxy A71 a potentially better long-term investment.