The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y76 5G and Xiaomi Poco X5 are two strong contenders. Both offer 5G connectivity and compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X5 edges out the Y76 5G thanks to its brighter display, more efficient Snapdragon chipset, and slightly faster charging. However, the Y76 5G's MediaTek Dimensity 700 offers competitive performance and a sleek design. Ultimately, the Poco X5 provides a better overall package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 23 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 23 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 7.8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 165.9 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 460 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 32 min | 33W wired, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | 4100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Aurora, Midnight Space | Jaguar Black, Wildcat Blue, Supernova Green |
| Models | V2124 | 22111317PG, 22111317PI |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.84 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 106h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.3 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 400895 (v9)
GeekBench: 2088 (v5.1) |
vivo Y76 5G
- Sleek design
- 44W fast charging
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Potentially less bright display
- Performance may lag in demanding games
- Battery life not as impressive as Poco X5
Xiaomi Poco X5
- Brighter display (728 nits)
- Longer battery life (106h endurance)
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Good value for money
- Charging slightly slower (33W)
- Design may be less premium than Y76 5G
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 boasts a significantly brighter display at 728 nits compared to the Y76 5G (specs unavailable, assumed lower). Its 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggests excellent image quality. While the Y76 5G likely has a good display, the Poco X5 takes the lead in visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are missing. Based on general expectations for these models, the Poco X5 likely offers slightly better image processing and low-light performance due to the Snapdragon chipset's ISP. Further testing would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
The Poco X5's Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) generally outperforms the Y76 5G's Dimensity 700 (7nm) in real-world usage and gaming. The Snapdragon's efficiency also contributes to better battery life. Both have Octa-core CPUs, but the Snapdragon's architecture is more modern.
Battery Life
The Poco X5 shines with an impressive endurance rating of 106 hours, significantly exceeding what's expected from the Y76 5G. While the Y76 5G has 44W fast charging (reaching 70% in 32 minutes), the Poco X5's 33W charging (100% in 60 minutes) is still respectable, and the longer battery life compensates.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y76 5G is ideal for users prioritizing a stylish design and decent performance for everyday tasks. The Xiaomi Poco X5 is a better choice for those seeking a brighter display, longer battery life, and a more powerful chipset for gaming and demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Poco X5 is generally better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset.
❓ Does the vivo Y76 5G have a good camera?
The vivo Y76 5G has a decent camera, but the Poco X5 likely offers slightly better image quality and low-light performance.