The vivo Y series offers excellent value in the mid-range 5G smartphone market. Two contenders, the vivo Y76 5G and the vivo Y72 5G, share a similar chipset but differ significantly in charging speed and potentially other features. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo Y76 5G takes the win thanks to its significantly faster 44W charging, which drastically reduces charging times. While both phones share the same Dimensity 700 chipset, the Y76 5G's charging advantage makes it the more practical choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 23 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 23 | Available. Released 2021, March 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 7.8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 460 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 32 min | 18W wired |
| Type | 4100 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Aurora, Midnight Space | Graphite Black, Dream Glow |
| Models | V2124 | V2041 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 270 EUR |
vivo Y76 5G
- Faster 44W Charging
- Potentially better camera system
- Sleek design
- 5G Connectivity
- Potentially higher price
- Similar chipset to Y72 5G
vivo Y72 5G
- More affordable
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- 5G Connectivity
- All-day battery life
- Slow 18W Charging
- Potentially less impressive camera
- May lack some premium features
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar 6.58-inch FHD+ displays, potentially with a 90Hz refresh rate. Expect vibrant colors and decent viewing angles. Differences might lie in the panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and peak brightness, which would need further investigation. The Y76 5G might have a slightly improved display based on available information.
Camera Comparison
The vivo Y76 5G is expected to have a more advanced camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing algorithms. The Y72 5G likely offers a capable camera setup, but the Y76 5G should deliver better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Specific megapixel counts and features (e.g., OIS) would need to be confirmed.
Performance
Powered by the same Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset, both phones offer comparable performance for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming. Don't expect flagship-level performance, but they should handle most apps smoothly. RAM and storage configurations could vary, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life. However, the charging speed is the key differentiator. The Y76 5G's 44W charging is significantly faster than the Y72 5G's 18W charging, allowing for much quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y76 5G is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging and don't want to wait hours for their phone to power up. The vivo Y72 5G is a good option for those on a tighter budget who are less concerned about charging speed and are looking for a reliable 5G smartphone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 700 chipset good for gaming?
The Dimensity 700 is suitable for casual gaming and light to moderate gaming sessions. Don't expect to run demanding games at high settings.
❓ What is the difference in camera quality between the two phones?
The vivo Y76 5G is expected to have a better camera system with potentially higher resolution sensors and improved image processing, resulting in better image quality, especially in low light.