The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y75 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) are key contenders. While both aim to deliver a compelling experience, they take different approaches to performance and charging speed. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) emerges as the stronger choice. Its more efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset, coupled with significantly faster 67W charging, provides a smoother and more convenient daily experience, despite the vivo Y75's slightly lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 21 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 21 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.4 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 65% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Shadow, Dancing Waves | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | - | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 0.66 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y75
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable MediaTek chipset
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Less power-efficient chipset (12nm)
- Potentially lower sustained performance due to thermal throttling
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 695 5G
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Potentially slightly higher price
- May not offer a dramatically superior camera experience
- Software experience can be divisive (MIUI)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a flagship-level display, but details are missing to make a direct comparison. However, the focus should be on panel type and refresh rate. Assuming both use IPS LCDs, the difference will likely come down to color accuracy and peak brightness. Without specific nit ratings, it's difficult to declare a winner, but Xiaomi often prioritizes display quality in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a definitive comparison is challenging. However, Xiaomi typically equips its 'Pro+' models with larger sensors and more advanced image processing. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), potentially delivering better dynamic range and low-light performance. The vivo Y75’s camera performance will be adequate for casual photography, but likely won’t match the Redmi’s capabilities in challenging conditions. We can assume both phones will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the quality of these modes will vary.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, fabricated on a 6nm process. This translates to superior power efficiency compared to the vivo Y75’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). While the Helio G96’s Cortex-A76 cores offer a slight clock speed advantage (2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the Snapdragon), the Snapdragon 695’s more modern architecture and smaller node size provide better sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. The Snapdragon 695 also unlocks 5G connectivity, a key advantage for future-proofing. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G will likely handle demanding apps and games with greater consistency.
Battery Life
Both phones offer substantial battery life, but the charging experience is where they diverge significantly. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) supports 67W wired charging, promising a 0-100% charge in approximately 42 minutes (advertised). In contrast, the vivo Y75’s 44W charging takes considerably longer, reaching 65% in 30 minutes. This difference is crucial for users who value convenience and quick top-ups. While battery capacity isn't specified, the Snapdragon 695’s efficiency means the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G can likely deliver comparable or even better real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar or smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y75 if you prioritize a slightly lower upfront cost and are comfortable with potentially longer charging times. It's a solid option for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value faster performance, more efficient power management, and significantly quicker charging – ideal for power users and those who frequently game or stream content.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. While it's not a flagship gaming chip, its architecture and efficiency provide a better gaming experience than the Helio G96, especially during extended gaming sessions where thermal throttling can become an issue.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the 44W charging on the vivo Y75 in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is significantly faster. While the vivo Y75 reaches 65% in 30 minutes, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G can reach 50% in just 15 minutes and a full charge in around 42 minutes (advertised). This means you can get a substantial charge in a much shorter amount of time, making it ideal for users who are always on the go.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds in India?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 supports carrier aggregation, which allows the phone to combine multiple 5G channels for faster and more reliable 5G speeds. This is particularly beneficial in areas with strong 5G coverage and can significantly improve your mobile data experience.
