The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y75 and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G are two strong contenders. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a solid user experience, they take different approaches to achieving this. The Y75 prioritizes a sleek design and rapid charging, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G focuses on a more efficient chipset and potentially longer battery endurance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a better balance of performance and power consumption compared to the Y75’s Helio G96. While both boast similar battery endurance ratings, the Poco’s faster 67W charging provides a significant convenience advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 21 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 21 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.4 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 65% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight Shadow, Dancing Waves | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 0.66 W/kg (body) | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y75
- Faster peak charging speed (44W)
- Potentially more stylish design (brand reputation)
- Competitive price point
- Less efficient chipset (12nm Helio G96)
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- Limited information on display quality
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- More efficient chipset (6nm Snapdragon 695)
- Faster charging with PD3.0/QC3 support (67W)
- Better long-term performance and thermal management
- Design may be less premium than the vivo Y75
- Camera details are lacking
- Similar battery endurance rating despite faster charging
Display Comparison
Both the vivo Y75 and Poco X4 Pro 5G feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting they are both AMOLED or similar high-contrast panels. However, detailed specifications like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the market positioning, we can assume both target a 60Hz refresh rate. The lack of LTPO technology suggests neither display will dynamically adjust refresh rates for power saving. Without further data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner; display quality will likely come down to color calibration and viewing angles, which require hands-on testing.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. It’s likely both phones feature a primary sensor paired with auxiliary lenses (ultrawide, macro, depth). Given the prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment, it’s safe to assume both phones include one, but its utility is questionable. Image processing algorithms will play a significant role in determining image quality, and this is an area where brand-specific tuning comes into play. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon ISP generally offers more advanced features and processing capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) is a more modern and efficient design than the vivo Y75’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The 6nm process node allows for higher transistor density and lower power consumption, translating to better thermal management and potentially longer gaming sessions before throttling. While the Y75’s CPU clock speeds (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) are slightly higher on paper, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores (2x2.2 GHz) are architecturally more advanced, offering better single-core performance. This impacts app launch speeds and overall responsiveness. The Snapdragon 695 also benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software and modem technology.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is considerably faster than the Y75’s 44W charging. The Poco can reach 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, while the Y75 takes 30 minutes to reach 65%. This faster charging is a major convenience factor, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y75 if you prioritize aesthetics and extremely fast charging – 65% in 30 minutes is impressive for this price bracket. It’s a good fit for users who primarily use their phone for social media, light browsing, and casual photography. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value sustained performance, efficient power management, and a more future-proof chipset. This phone is ideal for gamers, multi-taskers, and those who want a device that can handle demanding applications without significant throttling.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship chipset, it's capable of running Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The 6nm process and improved thermal management compared to the Helio G96 in the Y75 will help maintain performance for longer periods, minimizing throttling. Expect to adjust graphics settings for optimal gameplay.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 44W charging on the vivo Y75 in real-world use?
The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging is significantly faster. It can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes, while the Y75 takes 30 minutes to reach 65%. This means you can add a substantial amount of battery life in a shorter time, making it ideal for users who are always on the go. The difference is particularly noticeable when charging from a low battery level.
❓ Does the vivo Y75 support 5G connectivity, and if so, on which bands?
While the device name includes '5G', specific 5G band support isn't provided in the available data. However, given the chipset (Helio G96) is typically associated with 4G, it's likely the '5G' in the name refers to marketing and the device may only support 4G LTE. Confirming 5G band compatibility requires checking the official specifications or carrier support lists.
